(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Question about epsilons that occur in calculating beta functions in QFTs w dim reg

In deriving the beta function of, say, QED using dimensional regularization we get the relation (up to 1 loop)

[tex]\beta[e] = - \frac{\epsilon}{2} e - e \frac{d ln[Z_{e}]}{d ln[\mu]} \quad (1)[/tex]

and

[tex]Z_{e} = 1 + \frac{e^{2} A}{\epsilon}[/tex]

where e is the coupling, [itex]Z_{e}[/itex] is the renormalization of the coupling, [itex]\mu[/itex] is the arbitrary scale introduced to make the dimension of the coupling the same as if [itex]\epsilon[/itex] was zero, and A is some constant that does not depend on [itex]\mu[/itex] or [itex]\epsilon[/itex].

Now if I do the following math

[tex]\frac{d ln[Z_{e}]}{d ln[\mu]}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{1}{1 + \frac{e^{2} A}{\epsilon} } \frac{d}{d ln[\mu]} \left( 1 + \frac{e^{2} A}{\epsilon} \right)[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{2 e A}{\epsilon + e^{2} A} \beta[e][/tex]

Is this correct? It seems extremely elementary, but if I trust my results

[tex]\beta[e] \left(1 + \frac{2 e^2 A}{\epsilon + e^{2} A} \right) = - \frac{\epsilon}{2}e[/tex]

Taking the limit [itex]\epsilon[/itex] going to zero I get that the beta function for QED is zero up to one loop!

What seems to be usually done is we taylor expand [itex] \frac{1}{1 + \frac{e^{2} A}{\epsilon} } \approx 1 - \frac{e^2 A}{\epsilon} [/itex] and so

[tex]\frac{d ln[Z_{e}]}{d ln[\mu]}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{2 A e \beta[e]}{\epsilon} + \mathcal{O}[e^{4}] \quad (2)[/tex]

and next we put (2) into (1) and iterate

[tex]\beta[e][/tex]

[tex]= - \frac{\epsilon}{2}e - \frac{2 A e^{2} \beta[e]}{\epsilon} + \mathcal{O}[e^{4}] [/tex]

[tex]= - \frac{\epsilon}{2}e - 2 A e^{2} \left( - \frac{\epsilon}{2}e - \frac{2 A e^{2} \beta[e]}{\epsilon} + \mathcal{O}[e^{4}] \right) \frac{1}{\epsilon} + \mathcal{O}[e^{4}] [/tex]

[tex]= - \frac{\epsilon}{2} e + A e^{3} + \frac{(2 A e^{2})^{2} \beta[e]}{\epsilon^{2}} + . . . [/tex]

and we say as epsilon goes to zero it's approximately equal to

[tex]A e^{3}[/tex]

(For instance [itex]A = 1/12 \pi^{3}[/itex] for pure QED.)

How can we taylor expand in powers of e when [itex]\epsilon[/itex] is supposed to be tiny in dimensional regularization? Even if we do taylor expand and iterate what about the [itex]1/\epsilon^{2}[/itex] and possibly even more infinite quantities?

This issue really bothers me a lot because I'm sure there's something I'm not understanding here, since the QED coupling does indeed run as calculated, right? Any clarification would be deeply appreciated.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Question about epsilons that occurs in calculating beta functions in QFTs w dim reg

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Question epsilons occurs | Date |
---|---|

I Question about charge | Wednesday at 3:24 PM |

B Questions about Identical Particles | Mar 12, 2018 |

I Some (unrelated) questions about the measurement problem | Mar 9, 2018 |

B Questions about parity | Mar 8, 2018 |

Why does i-epsilon prescription not cure spin 1 propagator | Nov 25, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**