- #1

- 32

- 0

Is there a theorem that says it's derivative, f'(x), also approaches 0 as x goes to infinity?

Thanks.

- Thread starter vincent_vega
- Start date

- #1

- 32

- 0

Is there a theorem that says it's derivative, f'(x), also approaches 0 as x goes to infinity?

Thanks.

- #2

- 22,089

- 3,292

[tex]f(x)=\frac{\sin(x^2)}{x}[/tex]

What is true, that if [itex]f^\prime(x)[/itex] has a limit, then this limit must be 0.

- #3

Bacle2

Science Advisor

- 1,089

- 10

f(b)-f(a)=f'(c)(b-a) . Maybe you can partition [0,oo)into [0,1],[0,2],...,[n,n+1].

Then:

f(1)=f(0)+f'(co) ;f(2)=f(1)+f'(c1) ;.....f(n)=f(n-1)+f'(c_(n-1)).

Then you can find a closed form for f(n).

- #4

- 35,115

- 6,263

micromass's example shows this isn't going to work.If f is differentiable in (-oo,oo) , use the mean value theorem:

- #5

Bacle2

Science Advisor

- 1,089

- 10

Of course I'm assuming f'(x) is defined as x-->oo , that is implied in my argument.

Basically, take [0,b] . Then

f(b)-f(0)=f'(c)(b)

If f' is defined everywhere and we let b-->oo , then the limit cannot be 0 unless f'(c) decreases to zero.

If the OP says "its derivative approaches 0 as x --> infinity" seems to me to assume that the derivative is defined as x-->oo.

Basically, take [0,b] . Then

f(b)-f(0)=f'(c)(b)

If f' is defined everywhere and we let b-->oo , then the limit cannot be 0 unless f'(c) decreases to zero.

If the OP says "its derivative approaches 0 as x --> infinity" seems to me to assume that the derivative is defined as x-->oo.

Last edited:

- #6

- 35,115

- 6,263

You mean, that the limit is defined? If your argument relies on that then it needs to be stated.Of course I'm assuming f'(x) is defined as x-->oo , that is implied in my argument.

- #7

Bacle2

Science Advisor

- 1,089

- 10

This looks to me like an assumption that f'(x) is defined as x-->oo

- #8

Bacle2

Science Advisor

- 1,089

- 10

Maybe the OP can clarify the conditions of the problem to eliminate ambiguity?

- #9

- 35,115

- 6,263

No, that's what he's trying to prove. He didn't say "if f' approaches a limit, that limit is 0", so the most reasonable interpretation is that he wants to prove "f' approaches a limit, and that limit is 0".From the OP:" its derivative, f'(x), also approaches 0 as x goes to infinity? "

This looks to me like an assumption that f'(x) is defined as x-->oo

- #10

Bacle2

Science Advisor

- 1,089

- 10

no reason to assume it exists in a specific subset of the real line only, nor reason

to assume otherwise. In your interpretation, why didn't the OP say something like

is f'(x) defined, and if so , what is its limit. He refers to f'(x) which states that f'(x)

exists. It may exist somewhere or everywhere.

The problem is posed sloppily ; I think out of basic manners, the OP should clarify.

- #11

pwsnafu

Science Advisor

- 1,080

- 85

Then it does not follow that the limit ##\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}f'(x)## is defined. The statement "f' exists" is limited to ##x \in \mathbb{R}## because the domain of f is the real numbers and not the extended reals. What happens as ##x\rightarrow\infty## is considered a separate condition, and must explicitly be mentioned.f'(x) is said to exist without any qualification

- Last Post

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 538

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 2K