Question about looking back in time

  • Thread starter kleinma
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Time
In summary, Ned Wright's UCLA website has great tutorials on how to understand distance in the universe. Various ideas of distance are used.
  • #1
kleinma
92
0
Ok I was thinking about this the other day...

When telescopes like Hubble look at distant galaxies, it is really seeing them how they were x amount of millions/billions of years ago because that is how long it took for the light from those galaxies to reach the telescope.. Right?

Now if the universe is expanding, and said galaxies are moving farther away from us, then are we getting images of where the galaxy used to be? or where it is now? How does that work? Do we plot where these galaxies are in relation to where they are in the telescope shots we get? Or in relation to where we believe they are now (based on our estimated speeds of the expanding universe, and the speed the galaxy is moving away from us..

Also, If the universe started with a big bang, and was tiny and has been since expanding... looking back in time should show a smaller universe (i know we haven't seen an "end" of the universe.. but theoretically, shouldn't everything from billions of years ago that we see how be a lot closer together??)

oww my head hurts

someone clear this up for me??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The clearest answers on the web to these questions (with easy to understand diagrams) are at the UCLA website of a guy named Ned Wright who teaches cosmology there---he is also a member of the team that put the MAP satellite up to take the most accurate to date look at the Cosmic Microwave Background.

Wright is unusual in that he is highly qualified but also really gifted and motivated as an explainer at the beginner-level.

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html

Various ideas of distance are used. There is a "present moment" distance that takes into account the expansion of the universe since the light left. There is also a "light travel time" distance based on the estimated time it took to come here. And a couple of other main ones.

The "CosmoCalculator" at one of those links will calculate the various distances for you if you give it the redshift of the object.

Put in the redshift (z) and press "flat"----which assumes spatial flatness, the prevailing view. It will make adjustments for cosmological constant and so on.

The FAQ at the site are interesting. Wright's students must ask a lot of questions.

Have a look at the tutorial---it has four pages, several of which have good diagrams. It isn't perfect and it looks unfinished, but it is a lot more pictorial and accessible than other stuff I've found on the web.

Have fun.

Originally posted by kleinma
Ok I was thinking about this the other day...

When telescopes like Hubble look at distant galaxies, it is really seeing them how they were x amount of millions/billions of years ago because that is how long it took for the light from those galaxies to reach the telescope.. Right?

Now if the universe is expanding, and said galaxies are moving farther away from us, then are we getting images of where the galaxy used to be? or where it is now? How does that work? Do we plot where these galaxies are in relation to where they are in the telescope shots we get? Or in relation to where we believe they are now (based on our estimated speeds of the expanding universe, and the speed the galaxy is moving away from us..

Also, If the universe started with a big bang, and was tiny and has been since expanding... looking back in time should show a smaller universe (i know we haven't seen an "end" of the universe.. but theoretically, shouldn't everything from billions of years ago that we see how be a lot closer together??)

oww my head hurts

someone clear this up for me??
 
  • #3
Originally posted by kleinma
Ok I was thinking about this the other day...

When telescopes like Hubble look at distant galaxies, it is really seeing them how they were x amount of millions/billions of years ago because that is how long it took for the light from those galaxies to reach the telescope.. Right?

Right.


Now if the universe is expanding, and said galaxies are moving farther away from us, then are we getting images of where the galaxy used to be? or where it is now?

Where it used to be.


How does that work? Do we plot where these galaxies are in relation to where they are in the telescope shots we get? Or in relation to where we believe they are now (based on our estimated speeds of the expanding universe, and the speed the galaxy is moving away from us..

They are normally plotted using the Hubble law distance which is their distance at the present moment as seen by observers at rest with respect to the expansion of the universe---also called the "comoving distance". It gives a snapshot of the universe as it is believed to be now---not at a mishmash of various times in the past.

Plotting by "light travel time" distance would give you a plot that is a mishmash of various past epochs at various stages of expansion. And the light travel time distance is not compatible with the Hubble distance law---v = H0 D----which is basic to the subject. The Hubble law refers to the present moment.

Also, If the universe started with a big bang, and was tiny and has been since expanding... looking back in time should show a smaller universe (i know we haven't seen an "end" of the universe.. but theoretically, shouldn't everything from billions of years ago that we see how be a lot closer together??)

oww my head hurts

What was in a very small volume has been expanded out and is all around us.

The light that came from that small volume is now coming from all directions.

There are good diagrams of this in Wright's tutorial---especially page 3.

The whole-sky picture of the CMB-----that blue and red mottled oval you often see----is a snapshot of the earliest light we can see and gives a baby picture of our portion of the universe.

It is not from the very beginning but from some 300 thousand years after the bang----when things cooled down enough so the hot plasma turned transparent and didnt block the light. So that mottled oval is how it looked then.

Of course expanded out so it is all around us.

Look at the tutorial and enjoy!
 

1. How can we look back in time?

Scientists use various techniques to study the past, such as analyzing fossils, studying ancient artifacts, and using telescopes to observe distant objects in space.

2. How far back in time can we see?

The farthest we can currently see back in time is about 13.8 billion years, which is the age of the universe. This is because light travels at a finite speed and takes time to reach us, so the farther we look, the further back in time we are seeing.

3. What is the significance of looking back in time?

Studying the past allows us to understand the history of our planet, the evolution of life, and the development of the universe. It also helps us make predictions about the future and gain insights into how to better preserve our planet.

4. Can we see events happening in real-time by looking back in time?

No, looking back in time only allows us to observe the past. It is not possible to see events happening in real-time by looking back in time.

5. Are there any limitations to looking back in time?

Yes, there are limitations to how far back we can see in time. Due to the expansion of the universe, there is a limit to how far light can travel and reach us. Additionally, some events may not leave any traceable evidence for us to study, limiting our understanding of the past.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
111
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
714
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
155
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
460
  • Cosmology
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top