My question revolves around the following derivative:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

for z(x,y)

*sorry I can't seem to get the latex right.

∂/∂x (∂z/∂y)

What I thought about doing was using the quotient rule to see what I would get (as if these were regular differentials). So, I "factored out" the 1/∂x, then did the quotient rule with the "differential," then divided by ∂x.

∂/∂x (∂z/∂y) = 1/∂x(∂ (∂z/∂y))

Doing the quotient rule with the bold:

1/∂x"(low d high - high d low )/low squared"

which gave:

1/∂x(∂y∂²z - ∂z∂²y)/(∂y²)

Now divide by ∂x:

(∂y∂²z -∂z∂²y)/(∂x∂y²)

Now, if I assume the bold above is somehow zero, suddenly I have the right answer:

(∂²z)/(∂x∂y)

Now, I know this is probably horrid math(I can't emphasize this enough. Battlemage! ≠ crank), but if only that second term in the top of the fraction is zero then it works.

So, my question is, is there any legitimacy whatsoever to this?

Oddly, if I do it with this:

∂/∂x (∂z/∂x)

I get again the same result, with the second term in the top of the fraction = 0, then it's the right answer:

1/∂x ("(low d high - high d low)/low squared" )

1/∂x ((∂x ∂²z - ∂z∂²x)/(∂x²) )

((∂x ∂²z - ∂z∂²x)/(∂x³)

assume right term in numerator = 0

(∂x ∂²z)/(∂x³) = ∂²z/(∂x²)

Just what is going on here...

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Question about partial derivatives (it's probably based on flawed reasoning, but )

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**