Question about Surreal Numbers and Omnific Integers

It is a difficult task due to the proper class nature of the surreal numbers, but there is some hope based on Tarski's successful axiomatization of the ordinal numbers, another proper class in set theory. In summary, the Omnific integers cannot be axiomatized without defining the surreal numbers, but progress has been made in axiomatizing their arithmetic.
  • #1
lugita15
1,554
15
Omnific integers are the counterpart in the Surreal numbers of integers. The surreal numbers are usually defined using set theory, and then the omnific integers are defined as a particular subset of them. My question is, does it have to be this way? Is it possible to give a first-order axiomatization of the Omnific integers and their arithmetic, without having to define the surreal numbers themselves? I know they form a proper class, so there is a risk that they may be "too big" to describe. But Tarksi gave a first-order axiomatization for the ordinal numbers, which also form a proper class, so at least we have some hope.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thank You in Advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Unfortunately, it is not possible to give a first-order axiomatization of the Omnific integers without defining the surreal numbers. The surreal numbers are an integral part of the definition of the Omnific integers and cannot be excluded from the axiomatization. However, there have been some attempts to axiomatize the arithmetic of the Omnific integers, such as in the work of Lev Beklemishev and his colleagues.
 

1. What are surreal numbers and omnific integers?

Surreal numbers are a mathematical concept introduced by John Conway in 1976. They are an extension of the real numbers that include infinitely small and infinitely large numbers. Omnific integers are a subset of surreal numbers that represent the counting numbers (1, 2, 3, etc.) and their negative counterparts.

2. How are surreal numbers and omnific integers different from other number systems?

Unlike other number systems, surreal numbers and omnific integers allow for the representation of infinitely small and infinitely large numbers. Additionally, surreal numbers are defined by a set of rules rather than a specific numerical value, making them a more abstract concept.

3. What are the applications of surreal numbers and omnific integers?

Surreal numbers have been applied in game theory, combinatorial game theory, and the study of infinite sets. They have also been proposed as a foundation for other number systems, such as the hyperreal numbers and the superreal numbers.

4. How are surreal numbers and omnific integers defined?

Surreal numbers are defined by a set of mathematical rules known as the Surreal Number Game, which involves constructing numbers from smaller ones and then comparing them to determine their magnitude. Omnific integers are defined as a subset of surreal numbers that represent the counting numbers and their negative counterparts.

5. Are there any limitations or controversies surrounding surreal numbers and omnific integers?

Some mathematicians argue that surreal numbers and omnific integers are too abstract and do not have any practical applications. There is also debate about whether they are a valid mathematical concept or just a theoretical construct. However, many others see the potential of these numbers and continue to explore their properties and applications.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
336
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • Calculus
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
0
Views
626
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top