Question about the Many Worlds Interpretation

In summary: If the laws of physics in other universes are different, then the entropy of those universes would be different, and that would violate the second law of thermodynamics.
  • #1
Manchot
473
4
I was learning about the "Many Worlds" interpretation of QM, and it got me to thinking. In some ways, doesn't it contradict the laws of thermodynamics? I came up with the following thought experiment:

Suppose that you had a gas containing nitrogen and oxygen in a homogeneous mixture, in a container separated by a porous membrane. Now, I'm assuming that in each collision, the final positions and velocities of each molecule is at least somewhat determined by the instantaneous position of the molecules' electrons at the time of the collision. That means that there is a slight (nearly infinitesmal) possibility that all of the nitrogen will end up on one half of the membrane, and that all of the oxygen will end up on the other half. Now, since the probability is not zero, according to the Many Worlds interpretation of QM, there are at least a handful of universes in which this will indeed happen. Therefore, this means that the entropy of those universes has in fact decreased. Now, I was under the impression that the laws of physics of the every universe would be the same, and as a result, the entropy should not ever decrease. Isn't this an inherent contradiction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Whose to say that the laws of physics in other universes are the same as ours?
 
  • #3
QuantumDefect said:
Whose to say that the laws of physics in other universes are the same as ours?

Well you don't have to go onto the QM MWI to get the same result. With statistical classical mechanics you also have a non null probability (finite number of particles) to get the 2 gas separated again. It only takes a huge time to recover this configuration >> age of universe, a lot of work has been done on that subject -eg poincare theorem, poincare paradox, ergodism hypothesis ...) . This probability is very low for a finite time.

Now, for all experiments with a finite time, you can approximate this probability as a zero probability or you can consider the time to get such a configuration to be infinite (you cannot detect the infinitesimal differences). Therefore you can say that "entropy" works fall all experiments with a finite time (ie all the "laws" work within their domain of application). MWI does not change this fact.

Seratend.
 
  • #4
QuantumDefect said:
Whose to say that the laws of physics in other universes are the same as ours?

Well, if not, then the "many worlds" interpretation becomes meaningless.
 

1. What is the Many Worlds Interpretation?

The Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) is a theory in quantum mechanics that suggests the existence of parallel universes. It proposes that every time a quantum event with multiple possible outcomes occurs, the universe splits into multiple parallel universes, each containing a different outcome.

2. How does the Many Worlds Interpretation differ from other interpretations of quantum mechanics?

The Many Worlds Interpretation differs from other interpretations, such as the Copenhagen Interpretation, in that it does not rely on the collapse of the wave function to determine a single outcome. Instead, it suggests that all possible outcomes exist simultaneously in parallel universes.

3. Is the Many Worlds Interpretation a widely accepted theory?

The Many Worlds Interpretation is not a widely accepted theory in the scientific community. While it has gained some traction and has been explored in various thought experiments, it is still considered a controversial and speculative interpretation of quantum mechanics.

4. What evidence supports the Many Worlds Interpretation?

Currently, there is no empirical evidence that directly supports the Many Worlds Interpretation. However, some argue that it provides a more complete and consistent explanation for quantum phenomena, and that it aligns with the mathematical equations of quantum mechanics.

5. What are some potential implications of the Many Worlds Interpretation?

If the Many Worlds Interpretation is true, it would mean that there are an infinite number of parallel universes, each with its own unique version of reality. This could have philosophical and ethical implications, and may also impact our understanding of time and the concept of free will.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
339
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
11
Views
657
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
4
Views
311
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
14
Views
972
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
5
Replies
174
Views
9K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
4
Views
861
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
34
Views
2K
Back
Top