So I've been reading Einstein's theory of relativity, and at one point when discussing the Lorentz equations' proof that light remains constant, he just states it without mathematically doing it. Probably because it wasn't the super scientific version (?) but I wanted to see how he did it, so I did it, but the only way it works out to exactly what it needs to be is if ##v=0##. So here's the math:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]x^1=\frac{(c-v)t}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]

[tex]t^1=\frac{(1-\frac{v}{c})t}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]

This is after you state that [itex]x=cv[/itex] and then substitute it into the Lorentz equations. So then you solve for [itex]t[/itex], and get [itex]t=\frac{\Big(\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}\Big)t^1}{(1-\frac{v}{c})}[/itex]. Substituting [itex]t[/itex] into the other equation, and simplifying it, I end up with:

[tex]x^1=\frac{t^1(c-v)}{1-\frac{v}{c}}[/tex]

The only way it simplifies to [itex]x^1=ct^1[/itex] is if, as previously stated, [itex]v=0[/itex]. And I'm sure it does, but I just cannot figure out why. First I thought [itex]v=c[/itex], since that was what was being measured, but then I discarded it, since mathematically it made [itex]x^1=0[/itex]. If somebody could briefly explain why [itex]v=0[/itex], I would greatly appreciate it!

Thanks!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Question about v in Lorentz Transformation equation

Loading...

Similar Threads - Question Lorentz Transformation | Date |
---|---|

I Question about derivation of lorentz transformation | Feb 24, 2017 |

Quick question about relative velocity in Lorentz Transform | May 9, 2015 |

Lorentz transformation question | Aug 29, 2013 |

Question about Lorentz Transforms | Mar 2, 2013 |

Lorentz Transform Derivation questions | Mar 10, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**