Question concernig E=MC^2

  • #1
What do the variables M and C reffer to, in the equastion E=MC^2?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
7
0
C stands for the speed of light I think and I know M stands for mass.
 
  • #3
Pengwuino
Gold Member
4,989
15
m = relativistic mass of the particle in question
c = the speed of light in a vacuum, ~300,000km/s
 
Last edited:
  • #4
i thought the speed of light was 299,292.6Km/S
 
  • #5
12
0
i thought that it depend on the environment where is the light, so the velocity of light in air is different than in water or glass . see more about diffraction of light
 
  • #6
ok well im basing the equastion out side the universe so... what then is C?
 
  • #7
Pengwuino
Gold Member
4,989
15
whatzzupboy said:
ok well im basing the equastion out side the universe so... what then is C?
C is the speed of light in a vacuum
 
  • #8
Pengwuino
Gold Member
4,989
15
irrehaare said:
i thought that it depend on the environment where is the light, so the velocity of light in air is different than in water or glass . see more about diffraction of light
Well the speed of light can change, but as far as the formula goes, you are able to determine the energy based off of its maximum speed i think. Since you can make it so that there's no actual light flying around in an isolated nuclear reaction, theres no speed to base a change in c off of.
 
  • #9
2,209
1
whatzzupboy said:
ok well im basing the equastion out side the universe so... what then is C?
Outside the universe? Wheres that? Why would there be light there?
 
  • #10
Pengwuino
Gold Member
4,989
15
whozum said:
Outside the universe? Wheres that? Why would there be light there?
And what matter would there be "outside the universe"???
 
  • #11
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,833
956
whatzzupboy said:
ok well im basing the equastion out side the universe so... what then is C?
You've been told what c is several times now. (And that "out side the universe" makes no sense.)

Pengwino said:
c = the speed of light in a vacuum, ~300,000km/s
Did you mean "outside the atmosphere" (i.e. in vacuum) rather than "out side the universe"?

whatzzupboy said:
i thought the speed of light was 299,292.6Km/S
Do you know what "~" means?
 
  • #12
2
0
HallsofIvy said:
You've been told what c is several times now. (And that "out side the universe" makes no sense.)



Did you mean "outside the atmosphere" (i.e. in vacuum) rather than "out side the universe"?


Do you know what "~" means?
Owned. But I thought the "C" was the speed of light in meters which would make it ~300,000,000 m/s. What difference does it make? In multipling, you would be multipling by 300,000,000 instead of 300,000.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,778
11
I suggest you keep you "owned" and "pwned" for yourself. Please.

Btw, I'm not sure I understand your post. When you say "What difference does it make?", are you saking yourself a question and then answering it, or are you really asking that question? Cuz my answer would be: "In so far as every unit system is as good as any other, it makes no difference wheter you take 'c' to be 300,000 km/s, 300,000,000 m/s or 1 M/s, where I have define the lengh 1M to be equivalent to 300,000,000 m (I heard this is what particle physicists use as the unit of lenght in their calculations)
 
  • #14
Pengwuino
Gold Member
4,989
15
xFlankerx said:
Owned. But I thought the "C" was the speed of light in meters which would make it ~300,000,000 m/s. What difference does it make? In multipling, you would be multipling by 300,000,000 instead of 300,000.
C can be done in any length. Heck it can be done in feet or centimeters or earths!
 
  • #15
538
2
[itex]E=mc^2[/itex] is basically an idea that when 'm' mass is annihilated , a radiation carrying energy 'E' will be radiated , signifying the idea that mass is a sort of condensed form of energy . In this equation 'c' is the light speed in vacuum , though light speed varies with the medium apparently , the photons that make up the light always move at this constant 'c'.

BJ
 
  • #16
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,833
956
xFlankerx said:
Owned. But I thought the "C" was the speed of light in meters which would make it ~300,000,000 m/s. What difference does it make? In multipling, you would be multipling by 300,000,000 instead of 300,000.
Oh, dear! I completely missed the "missing" 000!!
 
  • #17
2
0
quasar987 said:
I suggest you keep you "owned" and "pwned" for yourself. Please.

Btw, I'm not sure I understand your post. When you say "What difference does it make?", are you saking yourself a question and then answering it, or are you really asking that question? Cuz my answer would be: "In so far as every unit system is as good as any other, it makes no difference wheter you take 'c' to be 300,000 km/s, 300,000,000 m/s or 1 M/s, where I have define the lengh 1M to be equivalent to 300,000,000 m (I heard this is what particle physicists use as the unit of lenght in their calculations)
Sorry, its just a habit. I'll try to keep it to myself from now on. And I was asking the question in anticipation of someone else asking it, so I answered it as I thought fit in the next sentence.

HallsofIvy said:
Oh, dear! I completely missed the "missing" 000!!
Sarcasm or not? I can't tell.
 
  • #18
Pengwuino
Gold Member
4,989
15
How can people think that 300,000km/s is different then 300,000,000 m/s?
 
  • #19
33
0
whatzzupboy said:
i thought the speed of light was 299,292.6Km/S
To be exact, the speed of light in a vacuum is actually 299,792.458 km/s.

hk
 
  • #20
2,946
0
irrehaare said:
i thought that it depend on the environment where is the light, so the velocity of light in air is different than in water or glass . see more about diffraction of light
If the object in question is a particle then the E in the relation [itex]E = mc^2[/itex] is the inertial energy of the particle. c is the speed of like in a vacuum and has the value c = 299,792,456.2 m/s. m is the mass of the particle (and yelling will ensue if I don't point out that I'm speaking of relativistic mass). If the object is not a particle but a closed system of free particles or it is an object of finite size which is isolated in space then the same thing applies.

Pete
 

Related Threads on Question concernig E=MC^2

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
830
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
784
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
Top