if the dixmier trace of an operator A is defined as(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] \frac{\sum_{i=0}^{N}\mu_{i}}{logN} [/tex] in the limit N-->oo (infinity)

where the eigenvalues are ordered in decreasing order

would not it better to be defined as

[tex] \frac{\sum_{i=0}^{N}\mu_{i}^{s}}{logN} [/tex]

here 's' is a parameter to be FIXED mathematically so

[tex] \sum_{i=0}^{N}\mu_{i}^{s}=T.log[/tex] then 'T' is just the Dixmier trace

the idea is to define the number 's' to be real of complex so the zeta function of operator A

[tex] Z=Tr(A^{s}) [/tex] has a pole or a logarithmic divergence , then the normal definition of dixmier trace is recovered when s=1

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Question on Dixmier trace

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Question Dixmier trace | Date |
---|---|

I Astrodynamics Question: Derivation of Sp. Orbital Energy? | Apr 6, 2018 |

I Direct Products of Modules ...Another Question ... ... | Mar 31, 2018 |

I Correspondence Theorem for Groups ... Another Question ... | Mar 24, 2018 |

I Question about inverse operators differential operators | Feb 9, 2018 |

A Second derivative of a complex matrix | Jan 6, 2018 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**