Let:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]g_{j}(t)[/tex] be a curve in a group G, which goes through the identity element; g_j(t=0) = identity.

and:

[tex]\xi_{j}=\frac{d}{dt}g_{j}(t)\right|_{t=0}[/tex]

We know that:

[tex]\xi_{j}{\in}Lie(G)[/tex]

Why can we say:

1) [tex]hg(t)h^{-1}[/tex] (h is an element of the Group)

is also a curve in the group, which goes through the identity element, ie. g(t=0)=identity? [As an aside - how would you even go about doing this transformation - I mean if g(t) is a curve (for example g(t)=2t+4t^3), how can you combine this function with h and h^-1, which are, say, SU(2) matrices?]

2) [tex]g_{2}(t)\xi_{1}g_{2}(t)^{-1}{\in}Lie(G)[/tex]?

I mean, these look a bit like similarity transformations - can someone clarify why these statements are true?

Thanks.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Question on Lie Algebras

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**