Question on Orbital Motion and Conservation

In summary, the moon's deviation from its straight line path is caused by the force of gravity exerted by the Earth. This force does not require energy, as it is simply a result of the Earth's mass and the curvature of spacetime. The conservation of energy law is still upheld, as there is an exchange of potential and kinetic energy during every orbit. The Earth may lose a small amount of angular momentum to the moon due to mutual attraction, but this is out of the scope of the conversation.
  • #1
BigMacnFries
To make the moon deviate from it's straight line path requires a force and I assume this force requires energy. Considering the mass of the moon and the billions of years it has been orbiting the Earth this seems like a tremendous amount of energy expended. With regard to the conservation of energy law where does this energy come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The exertion of a force does not require energy. The Earth simply pulls on the moon because that's what gravity does. That in itself does not require any energy source.
 
  • #3
Further, for an object to remain at the same distance (roughly) from earth, it remains in a condition of constant potential energy. In actuality, the orbit is slightly elliptical, leading to an exchange of potential and kinetic energy during every orbit.
 
  • #4
Galileo said:
The exertion of a force does not require energy. The Earth simply pulls on the moon because that's what gravity does. That in itself does not require any energy source.

if i may be a little more anal in this explanation, energy (or "work") is expended only when the force moves an object along the same direction of the force. this is what the dot-product is about in defining work or energy. you can break up the movement vector into two componets: one that is aligned with the force (or in the opposite direction) and one component that is at a right angle with the force. the componet of motion that is aligned with the force will have some change of energy associated with it. the component that is at 90o with the force will have no change of energy associated with it. if the moon was orbiting in a circular orbit (it isn't, but let's say it is), then the force of gravity with the Earth and the motion of the moon are always at a right angle.
 
  • #5
If you look at it in the curved-spacetime approach to gravity, the moon is moving in a straight line. The mass of Earth provides the curvature. IIRC, the Earth actually loses a tiny amount of angular momentum to the moon, due to mutual attraction (tides and whatnot). It's out of my area, though, so I'd appreciate some additional input myself.
 

1. What is orbital motion?

Orbital motion refers to the continuous movement of an object around another object due to the gravitational pull between the two. This is typically seen in the motion of planets around the sun or moons around planets.

2. What is conservation of orbital motion?

Conservation of orbital motion is a fundamental law of physics that states that the total energy and angular momentum of an orbiting object remain constant unless acted upon by an external force. This means that the orbiting object will continue to move in a stable path unless disturbed by outside forces.

3. How does the distance between objects affect orbital motion?

The distance between two objects affects orbital motion through the force of gravity. The closer the two objects are, the stronger the gravitational force between them and the faster they will orbit around each other. Conversely, the farther apart they are, the weaker the force and the slower the orbiting speed.

4. What is the difference between a circular and an elliptical orbit?

A circular orbit is when an object orbits another object in a perfect circle, maintaining a constant distance at all times. An elliptical orbit is when an object follows a more oval-shaped path, with varying distances between the two objects at different points in the orbit.

5. How does conservation of orbital motion impact real-life scenarios?

Conservation of orbital motion plays a crucial role in many real-life scenarios, such as predicting and understanding the motions of planets and satellites, designing spacecraft trajectories, and analyzing the stability of celestial bodies in our solar system.

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
890
  • Mechanics
Replies
22
Views
837
Replies
4
Views
730
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
995
  • Mechanics
2
Replies
53
Views
2K
Back
Top