Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Question on reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity (Relation on X (Attempt inside)?

  1. Nov 1, 2011 #1
    Let X = { a, b, c }

    X x X = { (a,a), (b,b), (c,c) }
    { (a,b), (b,a), (a,c), (c,a) }
    { (b,c), (c,b) }

    1. Symmetric but not reflexive or transitive:
    R = { (a,b), (b,a), (a,a), (b,c), (c,b) }
    How come this is right? Isn't aRb, bRa imply aRa? isn't that transitive? is it because (b,c,), (c,b) is there but not (b,b) the reason why R is not transitive?

    I ask because the 2nd question is confusing. Here it is:
    2. Symmetric and transitive but not reflexive:
    R= { (a,a), (a,b), (b,a), (b,b) }
    See how aRb, bRa implies aRa so therefore it's transitive? How come it doesn't hold for the 1st question??

    Thank you for any help.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 1, 2011 #2
    Re: Question on reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity (Relation on X (Attempt insid

    Transitive means that for ALL x,y,z:

    [tex]xRy~\text{and}~yRz~\Rightarrow~xRz[/tex]

    It must holds for ALL.

    For the first one, it isn't transitive since if you take x=z=a and y=x, then you see that the above is not satisfied. So it doesn't hold for ALL x,y,z. It does hold for some x,y,z. But it does hold for some. But some isn't enough to imply transitivity.

    In (2), it does hold for ALL, so it is transitive.
     
  4. Nov 1, 2011 #3
    Re: Question on reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity (Relation on X (Attempt insid

    I'm sorry, I don't understand what the x=z=a and y=x then it wouldn't satisfy above.
    Could you explain more?

    EDIT: Then to make question 1 transitive, all I would have to add is (b,b) ?
     
  5. Nov 1, 2011 #4
    Re: Question on reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity (Relation on X (Attempt insid

    Sorry, typo. I meant that if x=z=b and y=c, then it isn't true that bRc and cRb and bRb.

    Adding (b,b) would not make it transtive.

    Indeed, we also don't have

    aRb and bRc => aRc

    since (a,c) is not in the relation.
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook