Hello!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I had a test in which the question that I will present here was asked. I got no points for my attempt at a solution. Do you think that I was still on the right track and that I deserve partial points? Here is the question:

"A number M is said to be an upper bound to a set A if M [itex]\geq[/itex] x for every x[itex]\in[/itex] A. A number S is said to be supremum of a set A if S is the smallest upper bound to A.

Assume that:

A = {(4n^{2})/(n^{2}+1) : n [itex]\geq[/itex]0 is an integer}.

Show that supremum of A is 4."

And here is what I wrote as an answer (not verbatim, but translated from another language):

"Since n does not have an upper limit, it can go toward infinity. In this case:

A = lim (n [itex]\rightarrow[/itex] [itex]\infty[/itex]) (4n^{2})/(n^{2}+1)=[itex]\infty[/itex]/[itex]\infty[/itex]. This shows that we can use l'hopital's rule. After using l'hopital's rule twice we get that A = 4. In other words, this gives us supremum. Since n always can be even bigger, this is just the smallest upper bound.

Answer: By using l'hopital's rule twice, I have shown that supremum A is 4."

Out of the possible 4 points that one could get on that question, I got 0. Was it justified?

Thanks in advance!

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Question on Supremum

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**