Question posed in a science magazine

  • Thread starter jimmies
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Science
In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of time dilation and length contraction in relation to traveling at close to the speed of light. The conversation also explores the idea of reducing travel time to distant stars by traveling at high velocities. A specific example is given, in which the rocket must travel at a certain speed in order for the round trip to take only 20 years for the passengers. Calculations and equations are also mentioned to determine the necessary velocity for this scenario.
  • #1
jimmies
3
0
Hello, recently I saw a poster with a clip from a magazine that had this situation and I was wondering if this is a completely impossible situation? Wouldn't you have to go several times the speed of light ?!

Suppose you wish to visit the red giant star Betelgeuse, which is 430 light years away, and that you want your rocket to move so fast that you age only 20 years during the round trip. How fast must the rocket travel relative to earth?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Are you sure this isn't a homework problem?

Anyway, the short non-numerical answer is that because of time dilation, you can travel 4 light years (as measured from Earth) in less than 4 years "ship time", though it will always take you more than 4 years earth-time.
 
  • #3
pervect said:
Are you sure this isn't a homework problem?
Anyway, the short non-numerical answer is that because of time dilation, you can travel 4 light years (as measured from Earth) in less than 4 years "ship time", though it will always take you more than 4 years earth-time.
Of course, from your point of view on the ship, the shortness of the trip isn't because of time dilation, it's because of Lorentz contraction of the distance between you and the star, so it's less than 4 light-years away...from your point of view you get there in less than 4 years, but you never exceed the speed of light.
 
  • #4
jimmies said:
Hello, recently I saw a poster with a clip from a magazine that had this situation and I was wondering if this is a completely impossible situation? Wouldn't you have to go several times the speed of light ?!
In an attempt to reduce the extraordinarily long travel times for voyaging to distant stars, some people have suggested traveling at close to the speed of light. Suppose you wish to visit the red giant star Betelgeuse, which is 430 ly away, and that you want your 20,000 kg rocket to move so fast that you age only 20 years during the round trip. How fast must the rocket travel relative to earth?
So if you want to get there in 20 years then you need to contract space by the factor 20/430 at least right? So use the length contraction equation to see what velocity gives you the contraction l = (20/430) l0. This will not be an exact answer but it will get you in the ball park.

For an exact answer you need l/v = 20 years, so you need solve,
sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) 430ly / v = 20 years, and that is not hard to do. Same answer as above to 5 decimal places. But when you are talking about traveling near the speed of light, 5 digit accurracy is not saying much. For example there is a BIG difference between .999995 c and .9999999995 c. I wonder if maybe when talking about the accuracy of a velocity calculation like this maybe the 9s on the left when in this form should not count as significant. Then we would say that velocity .999725 match .999723 to only 2 significant figures. Of course the lorentz contraction factor gamma seem to me like the most sensible way of representing velocities this close to the speed of light.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
ah i see. I've never worked with such large numbers before so i didn't think that time dilation and length contraction could make such a large trip take so short, in the perspective of the space team. i'll try the quantative method once i have access to a computer or a cell phone...at the time the only calculator i was equipped with is the one built into my cell phone.
edit: just tried this out with smaller numbers. Alpha Centauri is 4.3 light years away and you want to take a 1 way trip, how fast would the ship have to go if they were to age 12.7 years?
What i did was use the length contraction like mitchellmckain said, but the answer I'm getting seems off. Thus, my equation is sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) 4.3ly / v = 12.7 years. I keep getting v = 0.33858.
(I'm using http://webs.morningside.edu/slaven/Physics/relativity/relativity10.html to practice)
 
  • #6
jimmies said:
ah i see. I've never worked with such large numbers before so i didn't think that time dilation and length contraction could make such a large trip take so short, in the perspective of the space team. i'll try the quantative method once i have access to a computer or a cell phone...at the time the only calculator i was equipped with is the one built into my cell phone.
edit: just tried this out with smaller numbers. Alpha Centauri is 4.3 light years away and you want to take a 1 way trip, how fast would the ship have to go if they were to age 12.7 years?
What i did was use the length contraction like mitchellmckain said, but the answer I'm getting seems off. Thus, my equation is sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) 4.3ly / v = 12.7 years. I keep getting v = 0.33858.
(I'm using http://webs.morningside.edu/slaven/Physics/relativity/relativity10.html to practice)
Either your algebra is wrong or you are using the wrong number for c. In the units we are using c = 1.00 ly/year. But your answer is only off in the second significant digit.
 
  • #7
Ah I see, you were totally correct :). I got the same answer as it gave doing sqrt(1/((20/860)^2+1)) . Using a computer over a calculator to solve to significant digits helps too :). Usually I just used a calc and stared at the poster while waiting for the previous class to finish. Thanks a bunch!
 

1. What is the purpose of a science magazine?

A science magazine is a publication that aims to inform readers about the latest developments, discoveries, and research in the field of science. It also serves as a platform for scientists to share their findings and knowledge with a wider audience.

2. How are articles selected for publication in a science magazine?

Articles for publication in a science magazine are usually selected by the editorial team based on their quality, relevance, and potential impact in the scientific community. They go through a rigorous review process by experts in the respective field before being accepted for publication.

3. Can anyone submit an article to a science magazine?

Yes, most science magazines accept submissions from anyone, including scientists, researchers, and science enthusiasts. However, the article must meet the publication's guidelines and standards to be considered for publication.

4. What topics are typically covered in a science magazine?

Science magazines cover a broad range of topics, including biology, chemistry, physics, astronomy, technology, and environmental science. They may also feature articles on current issues, breakthroughs, and controversies in the scientific community.

5. Is the information in a science magazine reliable?

Most reputable science magazines strive to publish accurate and reliable information. However, as with any source, it is essential to critically evaluate the information and consider the credibility of the source before accepting it as fact.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top