Question: Quantum Two Time interpretation - arXiv article from Aharonov, et al.

In summary, The conversation is about a person seeking clarification on an article about the two-time interpretation of quantum mechanics. The article uses the quantum histories formalism and the authors seem to have conflicting ideas about reversibility, determinism, and pure states.
  • #1
EddieZ
8
0
Please let me know if this is the wrong place to post this question.

I'm really fascinated by the idea of time symmetry in quantum mechanics and it's implications for the measurement process. I'm trying to make sense out of an article posted in the arXiv by Aharanov, et al. and it seems like there must be something really interesting here, but I can't quite follow it. Hoping someone in this forum would find it interesting and might be able to explain it to those of us with a lesser background...

arXiv Article on Two Time interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Cheers,
Ed
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
EddieZ said:
Please let me know if this is the wrong place to post this question.

I'm really fascinated by the idea of time symmetry in quantum mechanics and it's implications for the measurement process. I'm trying to make sense out of an article posted in the arXiv by Aharanov, et al. and it seems like there must be something really interesting here, but I can't quite follow it. Hoping someone in this forum would find it interesting and might be able to explain it to those of us with a lesser background...

arXiv Article on Two Time interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Cheers,
Ed


a single word

Irrelevant

The authors use a version of quantum histories formalism (a generalization of path integral QM).

Moreover, the authors appear to be rather confounded on basic questions and develop an inconsistent mixture of reversibility with irreversibility, determinism with indeterminism, mixed with pure states, etc.
 

1. What is the Quantum Two Time interpretation?

The Quantum Two Time interpretation is a proposed interpretation of quantum mechanics that suggests that particles exist at two different times simultaneously: the time they are measured and the time they are observed. This interpretation challenges the traditional view that particles exist only at the time of observation.

2. Who are the authors of the arXiv article on Quantum Two Time interpretation?

The authors of the arXiv article are Yakir Aharonov, Eliahu Cohen, and Avshalom C. Elitzur. They are all physicists and researchers in the field of quantum mechanics.

3. What is the main argument presented in the arXiv article?

The main argument presented in the article is that the traditional view of quantum mechanics, where particles exist only at the time of observation, is incomplete. The authors propose the Quantum Two Time interpretation as a way to resolve some of the paradoxes and limitations of the traditional view.

4. How does the Quantum Two Time interpretation differ from other interpretations of quantum mechanics?

The Quantum Two Time interpretation is unique in that it proposes that particles exist at two different times, rather than just one, as suggested by other interpretations. This allows for a more comprehensive understanding of quantum phenomena and challenges the idea of a single, objective reality.

5. What implications does the Quantum Two Time interpretation have for our understanding of reality?

The Quantum Two Time interpretation suggests that our understanding of reality may be limited by our traditional view of time and particles. It opens up the possibility for a more complex and multi-dimensional understanding of the universe, where particles can exist in multiple states and times simultaneously.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
7
Views
667
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
3
Replies
76
Views
5K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
778
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
3
Replies
72
Views
7K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
3
Replies
79
Views
5K
Back
Top