Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A Questions about Accretion disk

  1. Oct 23, 2017 #1
    I was studying about Accretion disks and found some difficulties regarding some concepts. My questions are

    1. For an accretion disk, ## v_r<<c_s ## Why?
    2. The conservation of mass equation is derived as,


    The mass in an annulus of radius ##\Delta r## is ##2\pi r \Delta r\Sigma ## and it is changing due to the mismatch of mass outflow and inflow which is written as,

    $$ \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(2πr\Delta r\Sigma) = v_r(r,t)2πr\Sigma(r,t)−v_r(r+\Delta r,t)2π(r+\Delta r)\Sigma(r+\Delta r,t)\\ \approx-2\pi\Delta r\frac{\partial (r\Sigma v_r)}{\partial r} $$

    up to this I have no problem but it further says that this equation in the ## \Delta r\rightarrow0 ## limit gives,

    $$r\frac{\partial\Sigma}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial (r\Sigma v_r)}{\partial r}=0$$

    and I can't able to derive how that limit gives that equation.

    3. The angular momentum conservation equation is derived from the Navier-Stokes equation as,
    $$ \frac{\partial \vec{v}}{\partial t}+(\vec{v}.\vec{\nabla})\vec{v}=-\frac{1}{\rho}(\vec{\nabla}P-\vec{\nabla}.\sigma)-\vec{\nabla}\Phi $$

    In the axisymmetry assumption and no momentum loss or gain from the ## z ## direction one gets,

    $$\Sigma\Big(\frac{\partial v_\phi}{\partial t}+\frac{v_rv_\phi}{r}+v_r\frac{\partial v_\phi}{\partial r}\Big)=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r^2 T_{r\phi}) $$

    Now my question is, shouldn't the RHS be ## \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r T_{r\phi}) ## instead of ## \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r^2 T_{r\phi}) ## because the ## r ## part of ## \vec{\nabla}.\vec{f}## in the cylindrical coordinate is ## \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r f_r) ##.

    Thanks in advance..
     
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 29, 2017 #2
    Thanks for the thread! This is an automated courtesy bump. Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post? The more details the better.
     
  4. Oct 30, 2017 #3

    stefan r

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Can you post the source. I like to check the authors definition of each symbol.

    ∇r is the "size" of the annulus?? The physical manifestation of that limit could be stated as "if the accretion disc becomes more like a ring or planet". There is no viscous laminar flow if the annulus has no area. could conclude that the mass loss is 0.

    For a generic f(x) = a-b
    limitb→a f(x)⇒0

    Is that saying the "turbulent velocity is much lower than the speed of sound"? Would be scary if that were no true. Storms on earth would be quite intense.
     
  5. Oct 31, 2017 #4
    See the attachment I can not understand how to derive equation (2.4) from (2.3).
    ##v_r## is the radial velocity of the gas in the accretion disk and ##c_s## is the sound speed.
     

    Attached Files:

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Questions about Accretion disk
  1. Accretion disks (Replies: 0)

  2. Accretion disks (Replies: 5)

Loading...