Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Astronomy and Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Questions about Lagrange points in the Pluto / Charon system
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Bandersnatch, post: 6601162, member: 399360"] No, the barycentre of two bodies is, in general, not a point where nett forces are zero. It's easy to see why, if we first imagine the one case where the forces are indeed zero at that point - the case of two bodies of equal mass. At barycentre we have no centrifugal forces, just gravity. From Newton's law of gravity: ##F_g=GMm/r^2##, the forces acting on a point mass ##m## placed at the barycentre of two massive bodies ##M1=M2## are ##F_{nett}=F_{g_{M_1}}-F_{g_{M_2}}=GM_1m/r_1^2-GM_2m/r_2^2##. And since both masses ##M_1## and ##M_2## are the same, and the barycentre is equally distant from each (##r_1=r_2##), these add up to zero. But it is an unstable equilibrium. If you imagine the point mass getting a tiniest push in the direction of either body, the distance r to that body will reduce, which will increase the force towards it while reducing the force towards the other body. The point mass then ends up dragged away from the barycentre. Now, if you do not have two bodies of equal mass, the barycentre will be such that ##r_1<r_2## if ##M_1>M_2##. If you place a point mass there, it will be attracted more towards the more massive body not only due to the smaller distance, but also due to the larger mass. Intuitively, if you imagine an object at e.g. the barycentre of the solar system, which is sometimes just above the surface of the Sun, you would not expect it to be able to hover in place. Would you? The entire mass of the Sun just next to it, and the tiny planets AUs away. The distances to the Lagrange points depend on the masses of the bodies, yes. But not in the same way as the position of the barycentre. Similar to the barycentre and point of zero nett force, described above - there is no simple proportionality. However, no matter how you change the masses of the two main bodies, it will always be true that L1, L2, and L3 are collinear with the line connecting the two bodies. While L4 and L5 are always at 60 degrees away from either massive body. These don't change, even if you vary the masses. edit: maths error corrected [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Astronomy and Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Questions about Lagrange points in the Pluto / Charon system
Back
Top