Questions about N=1 SUSY and Magnetic Monopoles

  • Thread starter karlzr
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Susy
In summary, for N=1 SUSY, the SUSY algebra is closed as long as the Bianchi identity \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}D_\nu F^a_{\rho\sigma}=0 is valid. However, when there is a magnetic monopole present, this identity may not hold and the SUSY is broken. This also applies to the N=2 theory with central charge, where the BPS monopole only preserves 1/2 of the supersymmetries. The breaking of SUSY in monopole solutions is similar to the breaking of other global symmetries in QFT. Additionally, the monopole is a finite energy state and therefore has a higher
  • #1
karlzr
131
2
For N=1 SUSY, the SUSY algebra is closed as long as Bianchi identity [itex]\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}D_\nu F^a_{\rho\sigma}=0[/itex] is valid, that is [itex][\delta_{\epsilon_1},\delta_{\epsilon_2}] \propto P [/itex]. What if there is magnetic monopole when Bianchi identity doesn't hold?
When N=2, there is central charge. But for N=1, there is no central charge. SO how to solve this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
karlzr said:
For N=1 SUSY, the SUSY algebra is closed as long as Bianchi identity [itex]\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}D_\nu F^a_{\rho\sigma}=0[/itex] is valid, that is [itex][\delta_{\epsilon_1},\delta_{\epsilon_2}] \propto P [/itex]. What if there is magnetic monopole when Bianchi identity doesn't hold?
When N=2, there is central charge. But for N=1, there is no central charge. SO how to solve this problem?

For any N=1 theory, the monopole solutions break SUSY spontaneously. So any state with a monopole present is not a supersymmetric state, but the Lagrangian is still supersymmetric.

Even for the N=2 theory with central charge, the BPS monopole only preserves 1/2 of the supersymmetries. These preserved supersymmetries satisfy the algebra where the central charges are identified in a particular way with the electric and magnetic charge of the (dyonic) state. There is a discussion of this around page 41 of Harvey's lectures. You should get the impression that the fact that any SUSY at all is preserved is very special and has huge consequences. These include the BPS bound on the mass and charge of the monopole for theories with at least N=2 SUSY, and further the exact Montonen-Olive duality of the N=4 SYM theory.
 
  • #3
fzero said:
For any N=1 theory, the monopole solutions break SUSY spontaneously. So any state with a monopole present is not a supersymmetric state, but the Lagrangian is still supersymmetric.

Even for the N=2 theory with central charge, the BPS monopole only preserves 1/2 of the supersymmetries. These preserved supersymmetries satisfy the algebra where the central charges are identified in a particular way with the electric and magnetic charge of the (dyonic) state. There is a discussion of this around page 41 of Harvey's lectures. You should get the impression that the fact that any SUSY at all is preserved is very special and has huge consequences. These include the BPS bound on the mass and charge of the monopole for theories with at least N=2 SUSY, and further the exact Montonen-Olive duality of the N=4 SYM theory.

Why do monopole solutions break SUSY? I am totally new in this topic and it seems there are so many new ideas to understand. If a vacuum breaks SUSY, I know the potential energy will be nonzero. This condition is usually satisfied in monopole solutions. Could you please explain more about the SUSY breaking of monopole solution? Thanks,
Lagrangian preserves SUSY ?:confused:
 
  • #4
fzero said:
For any N=1 theory, the monopole solutions break SUSY spontaneously. So any state with a monopole present is not a supersymmetric state, but the Lagrangian is still supersymmetric.

Coming back to the SUSY algebra, do you mean we don't need to discuss whether it's closed or not since SUSY is broken for such solutions?
 
  • #5
karlzr said:
Why do monopole solutions break SUSY? I am totally new in this topic and it seems there are so many new ideas to understand. If a vacuum breaks SUSY, I know the potential energy will be nonzero. This condition is usually satisfied in monopole solutions. Could you please explain more about the SUSY breaking of monopole solution? Thanks,
Lagrangian preserves SUSY ?:confused:

You might want to review the subject of spontaneously broken global symmetries in ordinary QFT. It is rather generic that we can have a symmetry present in the Lagrangian, but an individual state is generally not invariant under that symmetry. Typically one asks about whether the vacuum state preserves the symmetry, because, if it does not, then the low-energy effective Lagrangian describing the physics below the symmetry breaking scale no longer has the larger symmetry. But you can ask about multiparticle states as well.

For example, Poincare-invariant field theories have translational invariance, but if we consider a state consisting of a particle located at a definite point in space, then translation invariance is broken. This doesn't change the importance of translational invariance in the theory, the Lagrangian still has the symmetry, even though individual states do not.

In the case of SUSY theories, we recall that SUSY is a symmetry between bosons and fermions. Any state consisting of an unequal number of bosons and fermions is no longer supersymmetric. So already from this, we can understand why the monopole in an N=1 theory is not supersymmetric. In a theory with extended SUSY, there are composite SUSY transformations which relate scalars to vectors. I haven't personally worked out the details, but I would suspect that these are important in the discussion of what part of the SUSY is preserved by the BPS monopoles. If you look at what these are, you'll see that by construction, it is a background for the scalar fields of the theory that provides the magnetic source term in the equation of motion for the gauge field.

Monopole are also finite energy states, so a state containing a monopole will have higher energy than a SUSY vacuum.

karlzr said:
Coming back to the SUSY algebra, do you mean we don't need to discuss whether it's closed or not since SUSY is broken for such solutions?

If the Lagrangian is SUSY, then the SUSY algebra closes for the fields, viewed as perturbations of a trivial background. In a sense, this is true in the limit where we can take the strength of the interactions to zero and we have free fields. In the interacting theory, we have to be able to say something about the vacuum state. If we are in a SUSY vacuum, we will be able to show that the SUSY algebra closes. If some scalar fields pick up VEVs, then the vacuum might not be SUSY (or may not have as much SUSY as the free theory).

Now, as you've pointed out, the SUSY algebra closes on the gauge multiplet when the Bianchi identity is satisfied. This is always the case in the free theory, since there are no magnetic sources, only electric ones. When we include interacting scalar fields, as in the BPS case, we can generate magnetic sources in certain vacua where the gauge symmetry is spontaneously broken to a smaller group. So, in this sense, the spontaneous breaking of SUSY is directly related to the spontaneous breaking of the gauge symmetry. It is not any more or less special than standard examples of symmetry breaking in QFT.
 

1. What is N=1 SUSY?

N=1 SUSY stands for N=1 Supersymmetry, which is a theoretical framework in particle physics that extends the Standard Model by introducing a new symmetry between particles with integer spin (bosons) and particles with half-integer spin (fermions). It is a key concept in many current theories of physics beyond the Standard Model.

2. What are the implications of N=1 SUSY?

N=1 SUSY has many potential implications in the field of particle physics and cosmology. It could help explain the hierarchy problem (the large difference between the strength of the gravitational force and other fundamental forces), provide a candidate for dark matter, and offer a solution to the problem of magnetic monopoles in the universe.

3. What are magnetic monopoles?

Magnetic monopoles are hypothetical particles that possess a single, isolated magnetic charge (either north or south). In contrast, all known magnets have both north and south poles. These particles are predicted by many theories, including some that involve N=1 SUSY, but have not yet been observed in nature.

4. How are N=1 SUSY and magnetic monopoles related?

Some theories that incorporate N=1 SUSY predict the existence of magnetic monopoles as stable particles. In these theories, the monopoles are topological defects that arise due to the breaking of a symmetry in the early universe. Detecting these particles could provide evidence for N=1 SUSY and help us better understand the fundamental forces of nature.

5. How are scientists searching for magnetic monopoles?

Scientists are using a variety of methods to search for magnetic monopoles, including high-energy particle collider experiments, underground detectors, and astrophysical observations. These searches are challenging because magnetic monopoles are predicted to be very massive and have low interaction rates with ordinary matter, making them difficult to detect. However, the search for these elusive particles continues, and new technologies and theories are constantly being developed to aid in their detection.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
357
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
62
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
7
Views
787
Replies
9
Views
846
Back
Top