1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Questions on Forces

  1. Aug 10, 2011 #1
    Some background information: I'm doing some reading up for PhO (so it's beyond what I'm supposed to learn), and so I'll post all my questions here (regarding both concepts and actual practice questions). Sorry if you feel there is a lack of effort on my part, but sometimes I'm really lost and don't know where to start.

    1) http://imgur.com/3Wyp7

    My question: How come for the equality to hold, [ITEX]\mu_s \tan{\theta} > 1[/ITEX]? I can't get the link. And since we don't know what is N2 and N2 cannot be eliminated from the equation, how come there is no mention of N2 after the statement "For the equality to hold,"?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 10, 2011 #2
    First
    [itex]\ N_2(1-\mu_s \tan{\theta})+\frac{1}{2}mg=0[/itex]
    then
    [itex]\ N_2(1-\mu_s \tan{\theta})<0 [/itex]
    therefore:
    [itex]\mu_s \tan{\theta} > 1[/itex].
    There is no mention of N2 since in the equation it N2 refers to the norm of the force and is a positive number.
     
  4. Aug 12, 2011 #3
    But how come [itex]\ N_2(1-\mu_s \tan{\theta})<0 [/itex]?

    Shouldn't it be: [itex]N_2(1-\mu_s \tan{\theta}) = -\frac{1}{2}mg[/itex]?
     
  5. Aug 12, 2011 #4

    cepheid

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I haven't read the problem, but it seems to me that the two quoted statements above are completely consistent with each other. Both are true.
     
  6. Aug 20, 2011 #5
    Can you explain how you arrived at that?
     
  7. Aug 20, 2011 #6

    cepheid

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    If something is negative, then it is also < 0.
     
  8. Aug 20, 2011 #7

    kuruman

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I will say the same thing that cepheid has been trying to point out differently.

    We agree that [itex]N_2(1-\mu_s \tan{\theta}) +\frac{1}{2}mg=0[/itex]
    The second term in the above sum is positive. The only way that the two can add up to give zero is if the first term in the sum is negative.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Questions on Forces
  1. Tension Force Question (Replies: 8)

  2. Forces question (Replies: 1)

  3. Forces question (Replies: 1)

  4. Force Question (Replies: 3)

Loading...