Hello,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I stumbled about two things in GSW section 2.2.3 on Vertexoperators,

that I don't really understand.

The first one is GSW's statement just before 2.2.54, p. 88, that the

L_m's of the Virasoro algebra generate transformations like

tau -> tau -ie^{im tau}

.... From what was said on p. 65 of the generators of the residual

symmetry and on p. 72 from the Virasoro generators I know that these

should be conserved charges, thus generating some transformations with

f(sigma^+) = e^imsigma^+ and f(sigma^-) = e^imsigma^-, which is at

sigma = 0 just e^imtau. But how to get from this result to the above

transformation law?

The second one is the statement on p. 92 that for the two conditions

k_mu zeta^munu = 0 and tr zeta = 0 the tensor zeta should be a

symmetric traceless tensor. Tracelessness is clear, but how to show

that under this condition the tensor should be symmetric?

I hope that these questions are not too elementary, but as I am new

with the string stuff, many elementary things bother me most,

sometimes.

René.

--

René Meyer

Student of Physics & Mathematics

Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Questions on GSW 2.2.3

Loading...

Similar Threads - Questions | Date |
---|---|

A Question about Wall crossing formula | Nov 18, 2017 |

B Questions about Quantum Gravity | Oct 7, 2017 |

I Philosophy of Science and Symmetry Question | Jan 16, 2017 |

B Quantum gravity question | Oct 6, 2016 |

Susy algebra trivial question | Feb 18, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**