Queueing theory in massive transportation

  • Thread starter Thread starter jfimbett
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
jfimbett
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi

I'm working on a project trying to analize the massive transportation system in Bogota (Colombia). I know that simulation tools are better in complex environments but I want to try some analytic tools.

I was thinking how to model the process in which people wait for a Bus. But I don't know really how to model this process.

Suposse the capacity of the BUS is 100 people.

I was thinking of a system G/G/100/100. Am I correct?

Can anyone help me? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jfimbett said:
I know that simulation tools are better in complex environments
They are!

but I want to try some analytic tools.

I was thinking how to model the process in which people wait for a Bus. But I don't know really how to model this process.

You'll find that if you think clearly about how to create a simulation, you will be able to state all the information needed to do an analytic solution.

Suposse the capacity of the BUS is 100 people.

I was thinking of a system G/G/100/100. Am I correct?

Whether you are correct or not can only be determined if you use say what you are trying to use this model for. I don't see how you plan to visualize a bus as 100 servers. One cannot say whether a a model fits a situation unless the user explains how the components of the model map to the component parts of reality.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top