Quick Correlation Problem

  • Thread starter clane
  • Start date
1
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hello All,

I am trying to look at some correlation numbers and while I am aware that correlation does not always indicate causality can a correlation coeffiecent that is very near to zero be used to indicate that it is not a cause?

Thanks

C
 

Answers and Replies

mathman
Science Advisor
7,713
398
Elementary logic should give you the answer.

Causality => correlation.

Therefore: not correlation => not causality.
 
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,285
123
Let's be careful.

Causality does not always imply correlation because the relationship may be nonlinear. Correlation is a linear relationship.

If two variables are dependent, their relationship can be linear or nonlinear. If it's linear, their correlation will be significant. If their corr. is not significant, then you can say that the variables are not LINEARLY dependent on each other. But, they can still be non-linearly dependent.

So the answer is technically "No, a zero correlation does not mean no causality." A more roundabout way of putting it is: "A zero correlation would imply no causality only if a non-linear relationship can be excluded on other grounds."
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: Quick Correlation Problem

Replies
28
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
555
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Top