1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Quick notation+statement verification

  1. Jul 11, 2005 #1
    Do you agree that, [tex] \forall k \in \left[ {a,b} \right]\;{\text{where}}\;\left( {a,b,k} \right) \in \mathbb{Q}^3 [/tex],
    [tex] \exists \,\varepsilon > 0{\text{ such that}}\;\forall n \in \mathbb{N},\;\left( {\left\{ {k_1 ,k_2 , \ldots ,k_n } \right\} - a} \right) \subseteq \varepsilon \left\{ {0,1,2, \ldots ,\left\lfloor {\frac{{b - a}}{\varepsilon }} \right\rfloor } \right\} [/tex]

    |*Is this True or False ?
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2005
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 12, 2005 #2

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    i don't think it makes sense until you say what the k_n are. don't bother with the symbols just write it in english.
     
  4. Jul 12, 2005 #3
    Sorry:redface:; the whole mess seems to simplify down to this statement:

    [tex] \forall \left\{ {k_1 ,k_2 , \ldots ,k_n } \right\} \subset \mathbb{Q}\;{\text{where }}k_1 < k_2 < \ldots < k_n , [/tex]
    [tex] \exists \,\varepsilon > 0\;{\text{such that}}\;\forall n \in \mathbb{N},\;\left\{ {k_1 ,k_2 , \ldots ,k_n } \right\} \subseteq \varepsilon \left\{ {0,1,2, \ldots ,\left\lfloor {\frac{{k_n - k_1 }}
    {\varepsilon }} \right\rfloor } \right\} [/tex]

    *|is this True or False?
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2005
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Quick notation+statement verification
  1. What is this notation? (Replies: 2)

  2. Set notation (Replies: 1)

Loading...