Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Intro Physics Homework Help
Advanced Physics Homework Help
Precalculus Homework Help
Calculus Homework Help
Bio/Chem Homework Help
Engineering Homework Help
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Intro Physics Homework Help
Advanced Physics Homework Help
Precalculus Homework Help
Calculus Homework Help
Bio/Chem Homework Help
Engineering Homework Help
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Homework Help
Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Quick quantitative analysis problem
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="mfb, post: 4489908, member: 405866"] As a general remark, the value itself should be given with the same "precision" and the same decimal power as the uncertainty. Don't write 1*10[sup]-6[/sup] ± 1*10[sup]-8[/sup], write 100*10[sup]-8[/sup] ± 1*10[sup]-8[/sup] or 1.00*10[sup]-6[/sup] ± 0.01*10[sup]-6[/sup] or (100±1)*10[sup]-8[/sup].For method 1, you mixed ml and l, so your result is off by a factor of 1000. 2% as relative uncertainty is right. You do not have that, at least not with the correct uncertainty. The values are different here. And there is another factor of 100 wrong here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Homework Help
Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Quick quantitative analysis problem
Back
Top