"Particle in a Box" Measurement scenario

  • Thread starter IHateMayonnaise
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Measurement
In summary, the so-called Kronecker's Delta function has the property of having and area of 1 inside of an infinitesimal silver above one point.
  • #1
IHateMayonnaise
94
0
[SOLVED] "Particle in a Box" Measurement scenario

Problem statement:

Measurement of the position of a particle in a 1D well with walls at x=0 and x=L finds the value at x=L/2. Show that in a subsequent measurement, the particle will be in any odd eigenstate with equal probability.

Relevant equations/attempt at solution:

Well, we know that if the energy is not sharp, then it is realized as an expectation value, so

[tex]<E>=\int_0^L\Psi^*(x)\hat{H}\Psi(x)dx[/tex]

But, we know that any function, [tex]\Psi(x)[/tex] can be described as being a sum of "base states:"

[tex]\Psi(x)=\Sigma_{k=0}^\infty a_k\Psi_k(x)[/tex]

where

[tex]<\Psi(x),\Psi_n(x)>=a_k \delta_{kn}=a_n[/tex]

so, we can rearrange this to say that

[tex]a_n=<\Psi(x),\Psi_n(x)>[/tex]

where even solutions take the form
[tex]\Psi(x)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}Sin\left(\frac{(2n)\pi x}{L}\right)[/tex]

and odd solutions

[tex]\Psi(x)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}Sin\left(\frac{(2n+1)\pi x}{L}\right)[/tex]

So, if we wanted to find the probability of detecting the particle in an odd eigenstate, we would calculate:

[tex]\left|a_{2n+1}\right|^2=<\Psi(x),\Psi_{2n+1}(x)>^2=\left<\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}Sin\left(\frac{n\pi x}{L}\right),\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}Sin\left(\frac{(2n+1)\pi x}{L}\right)\right >^2
=\left [\int_0^L \left(\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}Sin\left(\frac{n\pi x}{L}\right)\right)^*\left(\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}Sin\left(\frac{(2n+1)\pi x}{L}\right)\right)dx\right]^2[/tex]

To my understanding, [tex]\left|a_n\right|^2[/tex] is the probability of finding a particle with a energy value of n, is this right? Or am I at least on the right track? Thanks all (as always...) :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You are using the wrong initial wave function: [tex]\Psi (x)[/tex]

Other than this, your work looks good.

Your particle is initially localized at x=L/2. What kind of function will represent this initial state?
 
  • #3
G01 said:
You are using the wrong initial wave function: [tex]\Psi (x)[/tex]

Other than this, your work looks good.

Your particle is initially localized at x=L/2. What kind of function will represent this initial state?

I don't quite understand what you are implying...the particle-in-a-box wavefunction takes the form of

[tex]\Psi(x)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}Sin\left(\frac{n\pi x}{L}\right)[/tex]

this way it satisfies the boundary conditions at x=0 and at x=L.
 
  • #4
Yes, that is the correct wave function for the eigenstates of the particle. The particle is not in an eigenstate though, it is localized at L/2. This means we need a function where the probability of measurement for the particles position is 1 for x = L/2 and zero for every other point.

Thus, we need the area under x=L/2 to be 1 and 0 over every other point.

Do you know of any "function" that has the property of having and area of 1 inside of an infinitesimal silver above one point? (I put function in quotes because it isn't really a function in the rigorous sense. This should be a clue as to what "function" your looking for.)
 
  • #5
G01 said:
Yes, that is the correct wave function for the eigenstates of the particle. The particle is not in an eigenstate though, it is localized at L/2. This means we need a function where the probability of measurement for the particles position is 1 for x = L/2 and zero for every other point.

Thus, we need the area under x=L/2 to be 1 and 0 over every other point.

Do you know of any "function" that has the property of having and area of 1 inside of an infinitesimal silver above one point? (I put function in quotes because it isn't really a function in the rigorous sense. This should be a clue as to what "function" your looking for.)

Why, yes of course! The so-called Kronecker's Delta!

Just so that I am sure that this is clicking correctly, let me summarize:

We can say that the wave function for the many possible eigenstates of a particle confined to an infinite potential well are given by:

[tex]
\Psi(x)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}Sin\left(\frac{n\pi x}{L}\right)
[/tex]

But, when a measurement is made, the wavefunction is no longer in the land of eigenstates (meaning, subsequent to a measurement the measured value is a definite number, i.e. it is localized), so the wavefunction collapses down to something along the lines of:

[tex]\Psi(x)=\delta(x-L/2)[/tex]

So that if x=L/2 (which it is, since this is where the particle is localized), [tex]\delta(x-L/2)=\delta(0)=1[/tex].

Assuming that this is all correct, I will not attempt to solve the original prompt, which asks to show tha tin a subsequent measurement, the particle will be in any odd eigenstate with equal probability. Thus, I will compute essentially the same thing that I attempted before, but with our new delta-dependent wavefunction:

[tex]
\left|a_{2n+1}\right|^2=<\Psi(x),\Psi_{2n+1}(x)>^2 =\left<\delta(x-L/2),\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}Sin\left(\frac{(2n+1)\pi x}{L}\right)\right >^2
=\left [\int_0^L \delta(x-L/2)^*\left(\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}Sin\left(\frac{(2n+1)\pi x}{L}\right)\right)dx\right]^2[/tex]

And if we recall the defining property of the Dirac Delta Function, which says

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\delta(x-y)f(x)dx=f(y)[/tex]

So, applying this to the above equation, we have:

[tex]\left [\int_0^L \delta(x-L/2)^*\left(\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}Sin\left(\frac{(2n+1)\pi x}{L}\right)\right)dx\right]^2=\left(\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}Sin\left(\frac{(2n+1)\pi \left(\frac{L}{2}\right)}{L}\right)\right)^2=\left(\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}Sin\left(\frac{(2n+1)\pi }{2}\right)\right)^2=\frac{2}{L}[/tex]

where this value holds for all odd values of n. Yay or nay?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Your work and reasoning looks good.

Just to make one point clear, you said "Kronecker Delta" in the beginning of the post and "Dirac Delta" near the end. Throughout this problem you are using a Dirac Delta, not a Kronecker Delta. Also for the Dirac:

[tex]\delta (0)=\infty[/tex]

You used the delta correctly under the integral sign, so this point shouldn't affect your result.

Anyway, your work still looks good, I just want to make sure you understand that you are using a Dirac delta here.

Good Job!P.S. (That delta sure made that integral easier huh? :smile:)
 
Last edited:

1. What is the "Particle in a Box" measurement scenario?

The "Particle in a Box" measurement scenario is a theoretical model used in quantum mechanics to describe the behavior of a single particle confined in a limited space. It assumes that the particle is confined within an infinitely high potential barrier, forming a box-like structure. This model allows us to better understand the behavior of particles at the atomic and subatomic level.

2. How does the "Particle in a Box" scenario relate to quantum mechanics?

The "Particle in a Box" scenario is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics. It helps us understand the wave-like nature of particles and how they behave within a confined space. It also demonstrates the concept of quantization, where the energy levels of the particle are restricted to certain discrete values.

3. What is the significance of measuring the energy levels in the "Particle in a Box" scenario?

Measuring the energy levels of a particle in a box allows us to determine the possible states of the particle and their corresponding energies. This information is crucial in understanding the behavior and properties of particles at the quantum level. It also helps us make predictions and calculations about the behavior of particles in other scenarios.

4. How do scientists measure the energy levels in a "Particle in a Box" scenario?

There are various methods for measuring the energy levels in a "Particle in a Box" scenario. One common method is through spectroscopy, where scientists use a laser or other light source to excite the particle and measure the emitted light. Another method is through electron microscopy, where electrons are used to probe the particle and its energy levels.

5. Can the "Particle in a Box" scenario be applied to real-world systems?

While the "Particle in a Box" scenario is a theoretical concept, it has many real-world applications. For example, it can be used to understand the behavior of electrons in a semiconductor, which is essential in the development of electronic devices. It can also be applied in various fields such as chemistry, materials science, and nanotechnology.

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
540
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
658
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
871
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
800
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
923
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
361
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top