Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

News Racism and the Race Card

  1. Aug 11, 2010 #1

    Char. Limit

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    So, I'm looking around at our Tea Party thread, and I notice that there's a lot of talk about racism. Now, this thread has only a passing connection to that one (inspiration, if you must know). I have a few questions I wanted to ask:

    1. Do you believe that pro-white racism is still a relevant problem in America?

    2. Do you believe that anti-white racism is still a relevant problem in America?

    3. Do you believe that politicians and journalists play the Race Card too much in modern times, say, 2008-present?

    Just for the record, I would have said yes to all three if asked.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 11, 2010 #2

    Pengwuino

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Define "relevant".
     
  4. Aug 11, 2010 #3
    All of the above.
     
  5. Aug 11, 2010 #4

    Char. Limit

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Yeah, I guess that is a fair question. I mean to ask if such racism is already mostly gone, and we can ignore it, or if it has to be actively fixed.

    Also, I don't define racism as "prejudice plus power", as some do. I define it as "belief that a certain race is inherently superior or inherently inferior, or less or more deserving of respect."
     
  6. Aug 11, 2010 #5
    #1 and #2 will always be problem for some people. As far #1 and #2 are a problem for some population, #3 will always be there.
     
  7. Aug 11, 2010 #6

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Yes to all 3, with the caveat that certain forms of anti-white racism is now incorporated into the law as acceptable practice or even required and along with that it is socially acceptable/required in many cases. So while #2 exists, it is not typically viewed objectively and properly defined in our society. In other words: to many, the word "racism" cannot be applied in the way you have used it in #2. It only is typically applied to white against black.
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2010
  8. Aug 11, 2010 #7
    While 1 and 2 are still both relevant, they're not nearly as much of a problem as they used to be, and they're on the decline. I'd say "yes" to number 3.
     
  9. Aug 11, 2010 #8
    Racism is a significant issue in America although it is often under-emphasized to maintain order, a perfect example of which is the very act of even asking the question which to me has a ridiculously-obvious answer. Anti-white racism still relevant? Are you kidding me? Do you know anything at all about black people? And all the media about their past "struggles" is just fueling the fire. We haven't seen nothing yet. In my opinion, racism will become a dominant, life-changing phenomenon one day in America and it's under-emphasis is only making it easier for one to loose and the other to win. It's a well-known phenomenon of Biology: when two competing populations engage, they conflict until one is exterminated.
     
  10. Aug 11, 2010 #9

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That view assumes that there are two populations and not one.....or 12 for that matter.
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2010
  11. Aug 11, 2010 #10

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    The other night on the "Colbert Report" on television, Stephen Colbert was "interviewing" a black man who regularly acts as a reporter and "consultant".

    Suddenly, the reporter took a card out of his wallet and "swiped" in a card reader that just "happened" to be sitting on the desk before him.

    Yes, it was the "race card"! But nothing happened! The reporter then looked more closely at the card and said "Ah, 'not valid during a black presidency'!"
     
  12. Aug 11, 2010 #11

    cronxeh

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Racism :rofl:

    I came to this country 10 years ago, not knowing much English, not having any money, not having any prospects. Over the years I have finished highschool, went to college. Where others whined that it was too hard - I have worked harder. I have built myself up from nothing, and if that makes me white then so be it.


    Never experienced any special favors, considering that all my supervisors and managers were black.
    Yes I think sense of entitlement and jealousy towards the white man is rampant.

    All the time. If it wasn't for race issues we would've eliminated welfare, housing subsidies, and well Ron Paul would've won by now.
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2010
  13. Aug 11, 2010 #12

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I will only allow this thread as long as there are no disparaging remarks made against any race, no statements of how a race is perceived to behave, is better or worse than, etc...

    Answers that do not strictly respond to the opening post will be deleted.
     
  14. Aug 11, 2010 #13
    I'm also not so sure you can say the groups are in competition. Furthermore, the members of these groups may more strongly identify with other groups than race.

    I would consider myself in competition with a snake oil salesman even if he was white, while I'd consider a black physics student as on "my team."
     
  15. Aug 11, 2010 #14

    Char. Limit

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    This was actually Jon Stewart. But, yes, the segment was hilarious.

    "They always get you with the fine print!"
     
  16. Aug 11, 2010 #15

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That was my point. The question was framed in terms of black/white racial identity, but what about hispanic? Mixed-race? Or, if the Constitution is to be accepted, the lack of racial identification? Part of what creates the issue today is that people still try to identify themselves racially instead of moving past it. The race card is part and parcel of that. Two cases in point:

    Tiger Woods is not a politician, but nevertheless, racial politics has followed him around in his golf career. The press has labeled him "black", but he rejects the label, partly because he doesn't want to dabble in racial politics, but also partly because the label is inaccurate. Though he looks somewhat African, he's only about 1/4 African, but half Asian. He calls himself "Cablinasian". So while the media inaccurately plays the race card on his behalf (really, for their own benefit), he does not. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_Woods#Background_and_family

    Brack Obama is called the first black president and he identifies himself with that label, but the reality is that he's half black and half white - so really he's the first substantially mixed-race President. Labeling him "black" is only half correct and so it is equally correct to label him "white". A post-racial politician might have used his mixed-race heritage as a bridge toward discarding of race labels, but Obama has chosen to make "black" his primary identity, reject his white background and capitalize on the race card as a central part of his political identity, while still somehow managing to convince people that he's post-racial. I have no idea how he's been able to pull that off, but so far it has worked out pretty well for him. http://articles.latimes.com/2010/apr/04/nation/la-na-obama-census4-2010apr04
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2010
  17. Aug 11, 2010 #16

    Pengwuino

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Barrack Obama hates black people.

    But on a more slightly serious note, I think eventually the term "racist" will lose all of its meaning. When you start calling someone a racist because you deny someone a pay day loan or something similarly trivial, no one is going to care anymore.

    I personally think the whole ideas of race and culture and being so anal about both represent a lower level of thinking. Why do people care about what their lineage was? People say that "I am who I am because of my heritage". No. False idiot. You're who you are and where you are in life because of you and, depending on how young they are, their parents. Then maybe their grandparents took some roll in it as well but beyond that, very little someone did 150 years ago has any effect on you, ESPECIALLY in a country like the US with such relative mobility and ways to advance yourself (and conversely, ways to destroy yourself).
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2010
  18. Aug 11, 2010 #17

    lisab

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    My rule of thumb: let the person identify themselves as they wish - it's not a question of what a person is "able to pull off."

    When the question of "is he black enough?" came up during the campaign, Obama replied that when he's trying to hail a cab and no one stops for him, he sure feels "black enough."

    And that's why we should let the person decide; none of us has lived in their skin, we have no idea what experiences they've had which influence their self-identity.
     
  19. Aug 11, 2010 #18
    Why is this thread different than any other? If people make racist comments, they get punished for it. Those are the rules. I'm sure you don't post that warning in every thread. Also, why do we have to strictly respond in a certain way, just because this is a topic about racism?
    This is an example of how exaggerated racism has become. It's the worst thing in the world right now, so we can't even freely talk about it.
     
  20. Aug 11, 2010 #19

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Why? Why allow someone to make false claims for personal benefit? The Constitution requires that everyone be treated equally under the law. On the other hand, some laws requires special treatment based on race. So should a person be allowed to identify with a certain race for personal gain, regardless of actual racial makeup?
    How can a law be written in a way that appropriately deals with racism if people are allowed to self-label? Heck, Obama can even switch back and forth as is beneficial to him!
     
  21. Aug 11, 2010 #20

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    For the obvious reasons of

    1) Not pulling the thread off topic

    2) To keep the thread within the guidelines for attitude, making everyone feel comfortable (yes, that is in the guidelines), avoiding flamewars, etc...
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Racism and the Race Card
  1. Racism (Replies: 78)

Loading...