1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

B Radian unit -- Why neglected in dimensional analysis?

  1. Dec 27, 2017 #26


    User Avatar
    2017 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Revolutions are counted be higher values than ##2 \pi##.
    Radians is a derived (from a circle with radius one meter) SI unit, which doesn't mean it cannot be a dimensionless number, because it is the ratio of two lengths, and ##\frac{m}{m}=1##. It simply means, we are allowed to write ##1 \operatorname{rad}##, in contrast to e.g. ##1 \operatorname{Oz}##. It makes mathematically perfect sense to consider it as a pure number, as in
    However, it can also make sense to treat it formally as a unit, e.g. when checking a physical calculation where the angles don't cancel out or in a case like this:
    In the end it remains a ratio of two quantities of the same dimension, length. And as such ##1 \operatorname{rad} = 1##.
  2. Dec 27, 2017 #27

    I like Serena

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    My point exactly.
    We can define angles with respect to either radians, degrees, gradians, grons, or revolutions.
    Still, we have to make sure to identify that unit of angle, because otherwise our calculations come to naught.
  3. Dec 27, 2017 #28


    Staff: Mentor

    We're running out of new things to say; this thread is closed. PM a mentor if you want it opened to say something new.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook