1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Radiation Pressure

  1. Feb 7, 2012 #1
    Hi everyone ! This is my first post!

    How can we prove that during the reflection of an electromagnetic wave on the surface of a perfect conductor, the magnetic field [itex] \vec{b} [/itex] acting on a surface element [itex] ds [/itex] is worth half the total magnetic field [itex] \vec{B} [/itex] using Ampere's Law. That is [itex] \vec{b}=\frac{1}{2}\vec{B} [/itex].
    This in order to justify the one half factor in the expression of the force acting on [itex] ds [/itex] which is [itex] d\vec{f}=\frac{1}{2}\vec{j_{s}}\times \vec{B} \cdot ds[/itex], where [itex]\vec{j_{s}}[/itex] is the surface current density on the conductor.
    A drawing would be welcome.

    Thanks in advance for your answers


    PS: Why does it automatically go to a new line when i insert a Latex equation?
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2012
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 7, 2012 #2

    jtbell

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    When you want an equation to appear "in line", use "itex" in the opening and closing tags, not "tex".
     
  4. Feb 7, 2012 #3
    Thank you.
    And what about the subject ?
     
  5. Feb 8, 2012 #4
    There's maybe another way to justify the [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex] factor without using Ampère's law ? It's how it was justified in my textbook but I couldn't understand it.
    Anyone ?
     
  6. Feb 9, 2012 #5

    Meir Achuz

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Consider a sheet of surface current K: KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
    with the EM wave incident from above. The B field comes from two sources
    1) the wave B_W, and 2)the current, B_K. Below the surface (in the metal) B is zero.
    That mean the two components of B cancel so B_W=B_K in magnitude and opposite in sign.
    Above the surface, B_K changes sign, but B_W doesn't, so the total B field outside is twice the field B_W which acts on the surface current.
     
  7. Feb 11, 2012 #6
    Yep I figured this out.
    Thank you for you answer.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook