1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Raising a block

  1. Sep 27, 2011 #1
    This is more a question about how the problem is written, rather than a question about how to do the problem

    vmUrc.jpg

    Why do they ask for tan γ in terms of d/l and h/l, rather than d and h? Is there some relation that I'm just not seeing? I'm pretty sure I know how to do the problem in terms of d and h, but the d/l and h/l terms are throwing me off
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 27, 2011 #2
    Welcome to PF, Expat09.

    If you look at all the rest of the terms, all of them are dimensionless. By this I mean, they have no units.

    [itex] \theta[/itex] is in radians, which are dimensionless
    [itex] \alpha[/itex] and [itex] \beta[/itex] are just constants to scale h and l.

    Therefore, to make h and d dimensionless, the author chose a common length, l, to make it so there are no units for d/l and h/l.

    Does this help at all?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook