- #7,841
berkeman
Mentor
- 67,025
- 19,836
@ergospherical I thought that was Photoshopped, but Google Images shows it's a real brand with lots of products. Sheesh!
Though Borg's problems are with the related caulk...berkeman said:@ergospherical I thought that was Photoshopped, but Google Images shows it's a real brand with lots of products. Sheesh!
But the fine folks at Grace Kitchens have probably put their kids through school off the shoppers who simply want to serve their friends cock soup.berkeman said:@ergospherical I thought that was Photoshopped, but Google Images shows it's a real brand with lots of products. Sheesh!
Keith_McClary said:Or anyone with an admitted juvenile sense of humor.
That's nutty. (Oh, and the link didn't work for me)Keith_McClary said:The Grace Kitchens Cock Flavoured Soup's ingredient list is a bit surprising. It explains that it contains no chicken, rooster, or any type of poultry.
Well, but it is supposedly a woman that contacted me; how did ' Lisa' end up with my number? At least she has not asked me for any questionable info. As long as she does not, I guess I can just go along. But it's still troublesome because modern scams are much more sophisticated than the old " I am an African prince and my money is being held.." kind. Edit: And the phone number may have been spoofed, so not sure she's in or from the UK.Ibix said:Most probable is some girl gave a creepy dude a fake number which happened to be yours, surely?
berkeman said:@ergospherical I thought that was Photoshopped, but Google Images shows it's a real brand with lots of products. Sheesh!
I can beat that. In a Tokyo barber shop was a big can of Cock Grease.ergospherical said:
Yes , I agree , I will just end it at that.Ibix said:Why go along with anything? Just ignore. You don't owe anyone an answer. If you want to be nice you could just text back "you've got a wrong number, I've never been to Singapore".
I'll be back here on 2039 to upvote this comment .Ivan Seeking said:I just received a new like on a post I made in October, 2003.
That must be a record for me.
10 Years after Apophis? Unlikely.WWGD said:I'll be back here on 2039 to upvote this comment .
Is that another one? Is that too about too few registers for dates?fresh_42 said:10 Years after Apophis? Unlikely.
Is that the asteroid? I thought it had changed course?fresh_42 said:10 Years after Apophis? Unlikely.
It's complicated, I think. AFAIK it will pass by, except it will pass through a certain area a few years earlier. Something like that.WWGD said:Is that the asteroid? I thought it had changed course?
I understand even if it veers of its path by a very small amount now, it will be hundreds of miles of. Is that its name ' apoph'?fresh_42 said:It's complicated, I think. AFAIK it will pass by, except it will pass through a certain area a few years earlier. Something like that.
This close flyby will drastically change its orbit. However, the Earth will also cross the asteroid's new orbit on April 13th each year. There will be another approximation as early as 2036. The exact distance is not yet known as small uncertainties regarding the position on April 13, 2029, will quickly increase after the deflection.
Oh great. Now the asteroids are colluding.fresh_42 said:Here is what Wiki says (no collusion in 2029 but ...)
In my phone now but will later check if it's a Tuesday or Friday 13th ( different in different countries). See how much superstition it will bring about.fresh_42 said:Here is what Wiki says (no collusion in 2029 but ...)
If you have a problem with asteroids, just get some Preparation H.WWGD said:Is that the asteroid? I thought it had changed course?
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/science-jokes.4463/#post-89554Ivan Seeking said:I just received a new like on a post I made in October, 2003.
That must be a record for me.
Seems these collisions are so delicate, even 10 minutes or so can make a big difference.fresh_42 said:It's complicated, I think. AFAIK it will pass by, except it will pass through a certain area a few years earlier. Something like that.
I thought that was for As# Teroids.Ivan Seeking said:If you have a problem with asteroids, just get some Preparation H.
Why not " materialize" in his trailer? Sorry, not that much of a fan of the show so don't remember the precise terminology.Ivan Seeking said:If you have a problem with klingons, just call Capt Kirk.
I saw an interview where William Shatner talked about life after Star Trek ended. He went through a divorce [IIRC] and ended up living in a trailer park not far from my home. Holy cow! It dawned on me that I could have ridden my bicycle to Capt Kirk's house!
I've once read an interview in which he said that he never cared a lot about money and always worked if he needed to.gmax137 said:Shatner is still working at 90 years old. He must have a passion for it.
You mean: Shatner. Is. Still working. At. ...;).gmax137 said:Shatner is still working at 90 years old. He must have a passion for it.
I remember a phoney contest in Mad Magazine where the prize was "a semester at the William Shatner school of acting."WWGD said:You mean: Shatner. Is. Still working. At. ...;).
I enjoyed his choice of. Personalizing. Punctuation. And. Emphasis. On. Whichever. Words. He. Decided to.