1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Rank of a matrix

  1. Dec 2, 2014 #1
    • Originally posted in a technical math section, so missing the template
    Let S = [ x x x x ; a x x x ; 0 b x x ; 0 0 c x]
    Find the rank of S-K*identity.

    Attempt I basically did straight forward row reduction and got

    [ (x-k) x x x ; 0 ((x-k)^2-ax)/(x-k) x-ax/(1-k) a- ax/(1-k); 0 0 (x-k)-b[x(x-k)-ax]/ [(x-k)^2-ax] (x-k)-b[x(x-k)-ax]/[(x-k)^2-ax]; 0 0 0 [(x-k)^2-ax(x-k)-c]/[(x-k)^2 -ax] ]

    It is given that the rank is 3. I am not sure how to prove this. Shouldn't I have gotten a zero row when row reducing?

    Are there any alternatives to find the rank of a matrix like finding the upper bound of the rank is 3 and the lower bound for the rank is 3?
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2014
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 2, 2014 #2

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    I don't understand your notation. I assume that "a", "b", and "c" are numbers but what about "x" is it simply another number?
     
  4. Dec 2, 2014 #3
    Oh Sorry! X can be any number. a,b,c are non zero numbers.
     
  5. Dec 2, 2014 #4

    Ray Vickson

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The determinant of ##S## has the form
    [tex] \det(S) = x^4 + f_3 x^3 + f_2 x^2 + f_1 x + k^4, [/tex]
    where the ##f_i## are polynomials in ##a,b,c,k##. For any given value of ##k,a,b,c## the determinant cannot be identically zero for all ##x##, but it may equal zero for at most 4 real values of ##x## (and maybe for no real values of ##x## at all). What does this tell you about the rank in general?

    I am not really sure how to interpret your question, where you say "it is given that the rank is 3". Does that mean that the person posing the question thinks the rank is always 3, or does it mean you are told the rank is 3 and are then required to say something about ##a,b,c,k,x##?
     
  6. Dec 2, 2014 #5
    K,a,b,c is not identically zero then det(S) =/= 0 => S is full rank.

    The question stated to verify that the rank of S-I*lamda = 3. This is needed to prove the geometric multiplicity. of lamda =1.
     
  7. Dec 2, 2014 #6

    Ray Vickson

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    OK: the question is mis-stated, but that can be fixed. A proper statement is that "If k is an eigenvalue of S, then S - kI has rank 3". (Of course, if k is an eigenvalue of S then the rank of S-kI is < 4, but you want it to = 3 exactly). I have not checked your row-reduction in your first post, but I think what you need to do is to show that there can be at most one zero row of the reduced matrix; that is, if one row = 0 the other three must be non-zero.
     
  8. Dec 2, 2014 #7
    Why does having k as an eigenvalue of S automatically mean that the rank of S-KI < 4?
     
  9. Dec 3, 2014 #8
    Nevermind. I got it! Thanks!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Rank of a matrix
  1. Matrix ranks (Replies: 4)

  2. Rank of a matrix (Replies: 3)

  3. Rank of a Matrix (Replies: 1)

  4. Rank of matrix (Replies: 11)

  5. Rank of matrix (Replies: 0)

Loading...