Rate of supernovae

  • #1
141
6
Which option is closest to scientists' current best estimate for the rate at which a supernova explosions occur somewhere in the milky way galaxy?
a) once a day
b) once a year
c) once every hundred years
d) once every thousand years

From what I have found online, the current estimate is one every 50 years but the question on my practice exam doesn't offer that as an option. Anyone got any links or know anything to help me.
Thanks.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2020 Award
32,969
11,445
the current estimate is one every 50 years but the question on my practice exam doesn't offer that as an option
It asks you which option is closest to the current best estimate. Which of the four is closest to one every 50 years?
 
  • Like
Likes Erenjaeger and Vanadium 50
  • #3
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
26,425
9,936
Well, if I wanted to quibble, I would say 50 years is only 49 years away from 1 year but 50 years away from 100. :wink:

The last known supernova in our galaxy was in 1868. (It was not visible because of dust, but the remnant has been found) The only one ever visible in M31 (the nearest large galaxy) was in 1885 (on the opening night of The Mikado). Given that, which answer looks the best to you?
 
  • Like
Likes Erenjaeger
  • #5
Chalnoth
Science Advisor
6,195
443
Well, if I wanted to quibble, I would say 50 years is only 49 years away from 1 year but 50 years away from 100. :wink:
Estimates like this work best by thinking about multiplicative differences instead.

For example, 50 years is fifty times the amount of time as 1 year, so those two numbers are very far apart.

Fifty years is only half of 100 years, though, so those two are quite close.

To do this a little bit more rigorously, you can use order-of-magnitude rounding. With this, numbers that are greater than [itex]\sqrt{10}[/itex] (about 3.1) round up to 10, while numbers below this round down to 1. So in this case, 50 rounds up to 100.
 
  • #6
1,524
624
Well, if I wanted to quibble, I would say 50 years is only 49 years away from 1 year but 50 years away from 100. :wink:
Estimates like this work best by thinking about multiplicative differences instead.
The question is about rate per year. That's a ratio, not a number by itself. 50 is not one of the options, 1/50 is.

1/50 is a lot closer to 1/100 than is 1/1.
 
  • #7
jbriggs444
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
9,611
4,258
The question is about rate per year. That's a ratio, not a number by itself. 50 is not one of the options, 1/50 is.
If one is considering multiplicative differences than it is irrelevant whether one is counting supernovae per year or years per supernova.

log(1/50) is closer to log(1/100) than it is to log(1) and for identical reasons, log(50) is closer to log(100) than to log(1).
 
  • Like
Likes newjerseyrunner

Related Threads on Rate of supernovae

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
891
  • Last Post
5
Replies
116
Views
19K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
500
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
4K
Top