Some of you may be familiar with Dingle, an "opponent" of SRT. I can condense his argument (the only one I know about anyway) to a sentence or two. Solve the Lorentz Transform for delta-t-prime, then divide through by delta-t.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

delta-t-prime/delta-t = gamma - gamma*v*delta-x/delta-t

[Dingle] "We therefore get different values for the ratio according to the (location of) events we choose... We can, by a suitable choice of events, make (delta-t-prime) greater or less than (delta-t), by any amount we like. But ... the relative rates of the clocks must be independent of the events chosen for their determination."

SRT sure explains a lot of stuff, but I can't figure out what may be wrong with his argument.

Any help appreciated.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Ratio of proper clock rates?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Ratio proper clock | Date |
---|---|

B Proper time of photon in Friedman metric | Feb 26, 2018 |

Ratio of time dilation relation in different potentials | Dec 21, 2015 |

Speed of light time ratio | Apr 28, 2014 |

Charge/mass ratio of moving particles (SR) | Dec 9, 2013 |

The ratio between temporal lengths is frame-invariant | May 7, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**