# Reaction at pin support

1. Dec 7, 2015

### goldfish9776

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
I'm asked to find the W and I was told that the rope at C is in tension , there is reaction at B , my question is , is there any reaction at C ?

2. Relevant equations

3. The attempt at a solution

File size:
107.3 KB
Views:
40
2. Dec 7, 2015

### haruspex

Not sure I understand the question.
The rope AC applies a downward force at A through its tension. That is the only way that forces at C can affect forces at A. Ropes cannot transmit torque about their endpoints or forces perpendicular to the rope.

3. Dec 7, 2015

### goldfish9776

So, is there any reaction at c ?

4. Dec 7, 2015

### SteamKing

Staff Emeritus
You don't care.

A free body diagram can be drawn around the beam which excludes C. All that matters, as far as the equilibrium of the beam is concerned, is that the rope is in tension, which means that Tc > 0.

5. Dec 7, 2015

### goldfish9776

Why the reaction cant be drawn at c ?

6. Dec 7, 2015

### SteamKing

Staff Emeritus
You don't care what the reaction at C is.

All you are interested in is finding the value of the distributed load w which keeps the rope in tension.

7. Dec 7, 2015

### goldfish9776

i have tried to do in this way , but i do not get the ans
vertical force = 80+10-RB+TC-RC-2W=0 --------equation 1
total moment about A = 80(1) +10(3)+W(2)(5) = 0
110+10W= 2RB , RB= (110+10W) / 2 ------------equation 2
total moment about B = -80(1)-2TC +2RC +10(1) +W(2)(3) =0

TC-RC = (6W-70) / 2 ----equation 3

Sub equation 2 and 3 into 1 ,
i gt 90-(110+10W) / 2 + (6W-70) / 2 -2W = 0
i gt 18W= 0
why cant i do int his way ?

8. Dec 7, 2015

### SteamKing

Staff Emeritus
Looks messy.

Why don't you take moments about the pin at B? This will save you some work.

Remember, the reaction at C is not a load on the beam. The only load on the beam at point A is the tension in the rope, Tc.

9. Dec 7, 2015

### goldfish9776

see it carefully , i did take the total moment about B ,
total moment about B = -80(1)-2TC +2RC +10(1) +W(2)(3) =0

if i ignore RC in my calculation , then my ans would be correct ?

10. Dec 7, 2015

### SteamKing

Staff Emeritus
You haven't got any reasonable answer yet that I can see. Remember, the purpose of this exercise is to find the value of W which keeps the rope in tension.

Again, for the umteenth time, RC is not a load on the beam. Like haruspex said way back, you can't push on a rope.

11. Dec 8, 2015

### goldfish9776

so , i have redo the question , here's what i gt :

80+10+2W -RB +TC= 0

moment about A = -80(1)+10(3) +W(2)(5) -2RB = 0
110+10W-2RB= 0
RB= (-110-10W) / 2

moment about B =
-80(1)+10(1) +2W(3) - TC(2) = 0
-70+6W-2TC= 0
2TC= -70+6W
TC = (-70 + 6W) / 2

90 + 2W - ((-110-10W) / 2 ) - ( (-70 + 6W) / 2 ) = 0
W=45N/m

is it correct ?

12. Dec 8, 2015

### SteamKing

Staff Emeritus
This is a superfluous calculation.

The moment calculation about point B looks good.

Then you went and spoiled it by adding the moments summed about point A.

You can write only one moment equation. Discard the moment equation about A.
Use the moment equation about B to find W, such that TC is always in tension. (TC > 0)

13. Dec 8, 2015

### goldfish9776

so , the W = 60/ 7= 8.57???

14. Dec 8, 2015

### SteamKing

Staff Emeritus
Where did this come from?

15. Dec 8, 2015

### goldfish9776

from the moment about B above

16. Dec 8, 2015

### SteamKing

Staff Emeritus
You might want to check that original moment equation again. There's no factors of 60 or 7 contained within it.