Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Reading books

  1. Sep 6, 2008 #1

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I've noticed lately that when I'm reading a book (fiction, sci-fi, fantasy) and get to an exciting part, I get impatient with the author's dragging the scene on for pages of tiny details and just skip ahead several pages to get to the outcome. I seem to be doing this quite a bit more than when I was younger. I wonder if tv and movies have made me too impatient to read 20 pages of what would be a 3 minute movie scene.

    I was wondering if anyone else skips ahead when reading.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 6, 2008 #2
    I'm in the same boat. But it's more attributed to losing attention rather than being impatient. When I read, I sometimes flip to the middle and will read a paragraph or two, then come back where I left off. It's not out of curiosity but it's just easier for me to assimilate the book by piecing together various parts.
     
  4. Sep 6, 2008 #3

    George Jones

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    It's more likely that now you're used to getting information from the internet. I've heard/read quite a lot about this in the media lately.
     
  5. Sep 6, 2008 #4

    lisab

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I often read like that...I annoy myself when I do :grumpy: . But so many authors seem to get the pace wrong.

    And I can't read thrillers anymore - it seems the author always telegraphs what's going to happen!
     
  6. Sep 6, 2008 #5
    I think internet, digital clocks(that shows seconds) and microwave are to blame.

    I want everything to be done in 500 ms (I am too impatient with 1000 ms waiting time).

    That's why I also hate doctors, transportation (it's damn inefficient to drive on those roads), credit cards (it takes me few seconds more to enter the number!) :cry:

    Fortunately, I watch calm movies that don't have endings. They are just a snapshot of beautiful lives.
     
  7. Sep 6, 2008 #6

    wolram

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Some books are like technical manuals full of detail, detail that you may or may not need, most times you do not, so you can jump to the part where it says button A starts machine, but may be you have to re read some if the machine does not start :redface:
     
  8. Sep 6, 2008 #7

    Moonbear

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I don't skip ahead, but I DO get impatient with some "scenes" getting dragged on and on. I haven't attributed it to TV, just to bad authors. They think they're increasing the suspense, but they haven't adequately edited, and rather than just drawing out the suspense, have gone too far and bored the reader with a bunch of unnecessary details that distract from the suspense.

    TV is even worse, but it's become so predictable, I can anticipate it now and avoid the frustration. "And the winner is..." <commercial break> I don't even expect to hear a winner announced on those reality shows or whatever they are until after a commercial break, so am already walking away by then (though, sometimes I miscalculate the length of the break and miss the ending anyway :rolleyes:).
     
  9. Sep 6, 2008 #8

    turbo

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    My wife skips ahead when she reads, even mysteries! I can't do it. If I'm going to read for pleasure, I'm compulsive about reading things in order.

    Even when I was a young kid, and "inherited" a bunch of classic literature that the former owner left in my bedroom (a walk-in closet) I had to read every word on every page. If I fell asleep or wasn't paying good enough attention, when I started reading again, I'd back up a few pages to make sure my comprehension was up to snuff. I've always been somewhat compulsive about books, to the point that I would try to puzzle out the Latin names of the sea-creatures Nemo described in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea. I read that when I was 10, and again a few years later. I always looked at the leading pages, too, to see when the book was first published, and where, and if there was a forward or other additional materials, I'd read those, too.

    I'm even worse about TV than Moonie - I can't watch it unless it is something educational or historical, or the news. I don't know if it's any better on the cable channels, but broadcast TV sucks.
     
  10. Sep 6, 2008 #9

    Kurdt

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I can't read fiction because I'm far too imapatient. Just seems like a lot of hard work reading all those pages of minutiae for not much enjoyment or new information. Thats why we invented TV. Its less work.
     
  11. Sep 6, 2008 #10
    I don't read fiction anymore. It's just fiction, there is so much reality to sort out.
     
  12. Sep 6, 2008 #11
    No, but I will read a large book (like a Harry Potter book) in a matter of days, putting everything else to the side if I can.

    One thing I always do (dunno why) is read the last page of a book first.
     
  13. Sep 6, 2008 #12

    Lisa!

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    No matter what sorta book that is, I always do it!:redface:
     
  14. Sep 6, 2008 #13
    the only time I'll ever skip part of a book is if I've read the book before.
     
  15. Sep 6, 2008 #14
    I find myself becoming impatient with some authors for dragging out parts of their books, but I just cannot skip pages. I must read every single word.
    Also, I find myself losing focus in the middle of books, so in the end I don't know what I've read. Then I have to go back and reread everything!

    I think it has something to do with obtaining information from the internet, as George Jones suggests...
     
  16. Sep 6, 2008 #15
    Sometimes I find it beneficial, actually, to read textbook sections, back to front, and then front to back like normal.

    I guess it just forces me to weed out a lot of otherwise totally inferential nonsense in the way. Chem was like this for me.
     
  17. Sep 6, 2008 #16
    I don't know what inferential nonsense means.
    I don't skip ahead in books, but I'll skip really long posts here.
     
  18. Sep 6, 2008 #17

    Moonbear

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Nah, that used to happen to me when reading books for high school English classes, and that was long before I was using the internet. It's just a sign of a boring book. Some authors can include lots of details that you want to keep reading, because you can tell it's helping develop the characters or scene in some way relevant to the story. Others just seem to be trying to fill up the pages, like we all did in high school on those 10 page essays when we only had 3 pages of content that we had to stretch.
     
  19. Sep 6, 2008 #18
    I just finished a book that took me 6 months to read. I'm quite proud of myself. On the cover it says 2 - 4 years.
     
  20. Sep 6, 2008 #19
    hahaha you are officially the man.
    Yeah me too. Anything with more than maybe four lines, and I just read the first few words then move on if its not interesting. It makes it really fun when I read responses to posts that I never read to begin with though.
     
  21. Sep 6, 2008 #20
    Christ what was it?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Reading books
  1. Reading books (Replies: 10)

  2. Best books read (Replies: 2)

Loading...