1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Real Analysis Help.

  1. Sep 25, 2008 #1
    1. Let a be a positive number. Prove that for each positive real number x there is an integer n such that na≤x≤(n+1)a.

    I have been looking through mounds of books, but haven't figured out where to start. Our teacher just left us hanging on how to figure it out. I am severely stuck and need help on how to get the problem started.

  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 26, 2008 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    What do you have to work with? Do you, for example, know that "for any y, there exist n such that [itex]n\le y\le n+1[/itex]"? If so, think about y/a.

    If you don't know that, do you know that "every set of non-negative integers has a smallest member" (the "well-ordered property" of the non-negative integers). It's not too difficult to use that to prove the property I mentioned above. Think about the set of all positive integers larger than y.

    Obviously, in order to prove something about positive integers, you have to use some property of positive integers!
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Real Analysis Help.
  1. Real Analysis! HELP! (Replies: 1)

  2. Help real analysis (Replies: 1)

  3. Real analysis Help (Replies: 5)