1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Real spectrum, not self-adjoint

  1. Oct 12, 2008 #1
    Let [tex]X[/tex] be a [tex]C^*[/tex]-algebra. I know that if [tex]x\in X[/tex] is self-adjoint, then its spectrum is real, [tex]\sigma(x)\subset\mathbb{R}[/tex]. I haven't seen a claim about the converse, but it seems difficult to come up with a counter example for it. My question is, that is it possible, that some [tex]x\in X[/tex] has a real spectrum, but still [tex]x^*\neq x[/tex]?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 12, 2008 #2

    morphism

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Yes it is. Take for instance the 2x2 matrix (so [itex]X=M_2(\mathbb{C})[/itex])

    [tex]x = \begin{pmatrix}a & 1 \\ 0 & b\end{pmatrix},[/tex]

    where a and b are any real numbers. The spectrum of x is {a,b} but x is not selfadjoint.
     
  4. Oct 13, 2008 #3
    I see.

    (hmhmhmh.... I didn't receive mail notification of your response...)
     
  5. Oct 13, 2008 #4

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    You will only get e-mail notification if you "subscribe" to a thread. To do that, clilck on "Thread Tools" at the top of the thread, then click on "Subscribe to this Thread".
     
  6. Oct 13, 2008 #5
    I am facing the same problem (see https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=257751)

    On the internet I found a reference, however I don't have acces to it:
    Real Eigenvalues of Unsymmetric Matrices

    In general you can not say anything about the eigenvalues of a real (unsymmetric) matrix. However, if you can write your matrix as a product of matrices then analyzing them you may say something about the eigenvalues of the big matrix.

    I put here two articles, maybe you will find them usefull.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Oct 13, 2008
  7. Oct 13, 2008 #6
    But isn't the subscribing automatic, so that one has to unsubscribe a thread if one doesn't want notifications. I didn't do anything with thread tools, and I got the notification of your post now.

    There is a non-zero probability for the possibility, that I casually destroyed the first notification without later remembering it. I cannot know it for sure, of course... I was merely mentioning the remark anyway.
     
  8. Oct 13, 2008 #7

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    When you initially join this forum you are offered the option of automatic "subscription" or not. I chose not because I don't want an e-mail everytime someone responds to one of the threads I responded to. I can't delete all those e-mails AND respond to questions!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Real spectrum, not self-adjoint
  1. Making T self adjoint (Replies: 8)

Loading...