Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Reality of motion in time

  1. Jun 10, 2004 #1
    quote from The New Quantum Universe by Hey, Walters:

    is that an accurate statement?

    does it imply that there's a complete non-link between even the simplest intuitive qualitative descriptions of quantum theory and the mathematics of it?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 11, 2004 #2

    selfAdjoint

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    The statement by Hey and Walters is misleading. The Feynmann diagrams are a condensed way of setting up the math. Each element in the diagram (input line, output line, exchange line, vertex) corresponds to a factor in the propagator integrand, so you can set up the math directly from the diagram.

    The math will work either as the description of an antiparticle traveling forward in time or as the corresponding particle traveling backwards in time. (think positron, electron). QED doesn't say which is the case. Feynman apparently found it easy to think of particles moving backward in time, but most physicsts prefer to think in terms of antiparticles.
     
  4. Jun 11, 2004 #3
    so it's a matter of aesthetics? :confused:
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Reality of motion in time
  1. Superstring reality (Replies: 5)

  2. Ulternate realitys (Replies: 6)

  3. Alternate reality (Replies: 2)

  4. Splitting Realities (Replies: 2)

Loading...