Really Bizarre Dreams & Deja Vous: Understanding the Mystery

  • Thread starter totallyclueless
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Dreams
In summary, the speaker used to have strange and complex dreams every night, but now they have stopped completely. They used to enjoy telling their outlandish dreams to others, but now they have nothing to report. They also experience frequent deja vu, which scientists have linked to small seizures in the hippocampus. The speaker wonders if their bizarre dreams were caused by these seizures and if there is a way to get them back.
  • #1
totallyclueless
12
0
I used to have the strangest, most strange, complex dreams. I had them every night from as long as I can remember. It was fun telling my dreams to people the next day. I got strange looks and laughs because they were so strange and long. Sometimes, they even came true. O__o

Anyway, lately my dreams have just been...GONE. Not there at all. If I do have a dream, it's very brief and meaningless...like me looking in a mirror and seeing my hair has gotten very long even tho in real life it is short. It's sad, because I used to be known as the crazy girl who told long, outlandish dream stories at the lunch table at school, but now I have nothing to report! lol. I want to get my weird dreams back. It's been a while. Does anybbody know why they stopped? :cry:

Also, lately, I've been having some really strong de ja vous. Like I dreamed it would happen...only I didn't...i just feel like i did. the other day i had a real long one in English class...i could have sworn i dreamed that at the beginning of the year. I know this has nothing to do with the post, but does neone know why i always have de ja vous? :confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hellooooo? anybody?
 
  • #3
How have you been feeling while awake? Normal, tired, energetic, moody, happy?
 
  • #4
I've been feeling the same as I always have...even when i still had the dreams. perky during the day, tired around 10 PM. normal. nothing different is going on in my life.
 
  • #5
totallyclueless said:
Hellooooo? anybody?
Right here!

The deja vu is an incredibly weird sensaton that the present situation you are in is unbelievably familiar, as though you are remembering it from the past even though there's no way it could already have happened.

Neurologists have proven that it is caused by a tiny bit of seizure activity in the neurons of a part of the brain called the hippocampus. Even though this is technically seizure activity it's nothing to get worried about: all that means is that the neurons are firing all at the same time for no good reason.

The hippocampus is a major contributor to memory. When it gets a power surge like this it creates the false impression that the present is a memory, when it isn't.

A small seizure like this is called a simple partial seizure.

I read a post on an epilepsy website where a guy was hooked up to electrodes for 48 hours to try and see if they could catch any seizure activity to positively diagnose him.

They woke him up in the middle of the night and said they had just caught some. The doctor told him he was having a simple partial while he slept. He said something like "Wow, I just thought I was having a particularly intense dream."

It could be that your dreams in the past were so bizarre and vivid because you were having simple partials while you dreampt. The fact you don't have them anymore is probably a good thing. You have probably cut something out of your diet that was throwing your brain chemistry off, possibly.

I wouldn't worry about the deja vus unless you have so many they drive you crazy. Everyone has at least one of these at some point in their life. Some people get them alot.
 
  • #6
isn't it déjà vu? :biggrin:
 
  • #7
zoobyshoe said:
Right here!

The deja vu is an incredibly weird sensaton that the present situation you are in is unbelievably familiar, as though you are remembering it from the past even though there's no way it could already have happened.

Neurologists have proven that it is caused by a tiny bit of seizure activity in the neurons of a part of the brain called the hippocampus. Even though this is technically seizure activity it's nothing to get worried about: all that means is that the neurons are firing all at the same time for no good reason.

The hippocampus is a major contributor to memory. When it gets a power surge like this it creates the false impression that the present is a memory, when it isn't.

A small seizure like this is called a simple partial seizure.

I read a post on an epilepsy website where a guy was hooked up to electrodes for 48 hours to try and see if they could catch any seizure activity to positively diagnose him.

They woke him up in the middle of the night and said they had just caught some. The doctor told him he was having a simple partial while he slept. He said something like "Wow, I just thought I was having a particularly intense dream."

It could be that your dreams in the past were so bizarre and vivid because you were having simple partials while you dreampt. The fact you don't have them anymore is probably a good thing. You have probably cut something out of your diet that was throwing your brain chemistry off, possibly.

I wouldn't worry about the deja vus unless you have so many they drive you crazy. Everyone has at least one of these at some point in their life. Some people get them alot.



o__O...really? no way. seizures? is that why my pillow is always on the floor when i wake up in the morning?? :wink: no..nobody in my family ever has seizures..and...i mean...i know other people who have bizarre dreams, too but they don't have the deja vous...i just think i had really weird dreams cos i have an overactive imaginations! :biggrin:
as for the deja vous thing, i prefer to tell myself that i can see the future! hehe. thing is, i don't "remember" it until it's actually happening...too bad. =/ yes, i do get deja vous quite a lot


anyway, is there any way to get my dreams back? it's not that I am not just having the bizarre dreams anymore, I am not having ANY dreams any more. Help!
 
Last edited:
  • #8
totallyclueless said:
anyway, is there any way to get my dreams back? it's not that I am not just having the bizarre dreams anymore, I am not having ANY dreams any more. Help!
Have you ever tried what is termed "directed dreaming"? This is where as you are laying in bed going to sleep, you consciously start your dream. You decide what you are going to dream about. You can start by recalling a favorite dream and building on it, when you fall asleep, you will continue to dream about it. It may take awhile to be able to do this, but it's very relaxing, even if it doesn't always work.

I had periods where I will have great dreams and then periods like what you are going through now where I don't recall as much and they are not as great. I'm going through that right now and it's very disappointing. :frown:
 
  • #9
aaaw, but it's not as fun that way! lol. my imagination works best when I am not consciously controlling it, for some reason..

but i'll try it.

sounds like daydreaming to me, but ill give it a shot. hehe
 
  • #10
totallyclueless said:
o__O...really? no way. seizures? is that why my pillow is always on the floor when i wake up in the morning?? :wink: no..nobody in my family ever has seizures.
It's not seizures the way you think about someone twitching uncontrollably, it's just a technical term for the activity of your brain, as Zooby explained. Of course it could also just be that you are doing things in some sort of routine and it feels like Deja Vu because you really are doing the same thing or are in the same place often.

anyway, is there any way to get my dreams back? it's not that I am not just having the bizarre dreams anymore, I am not having ANY dreams any more. Help!
You might still be dreaming, but just don't remember the dreams when you wake up. The only way you could find out is if someone wakes you up in the middle of your dream. It's possible that as you're getting older, your sleeping patterns are just changing so you naturally wake up in the morning before someone has to wake you up (or before an alarm clock goes off), so you aren't in the middle of the dream when you wake up, and thus don't remember it.
 
  • #11
Maybe you just aren't waking up as often during the night. You can google to see if or why that may be the case.

Or you can just ask Moonbear. :biggrin: Speaking of sleep... :zzz:
 
Last edited:
  • #12
What's the difference between a seizure and a normal period of increased brain activity, if any?
 
  • #13
totallyclueless said:
o__O...really? no way. seizures? is that why my pillow is always on the floor when i wake up in the morning?? :wink: no..nobody in my family ever has seizures..and...i mean...
Like I said simple partial seizures are seizure activity limited to a very small part of the brain. Everyone as at least one before they die. Most people have a lot more than that. Don't get freaked out by the word "seizure". It just refers to the hypersynchronous firing of neurons, and doesn't means full body convulsions. That's a speciic kind of seizure.

Most seizures aren't hereditary. You family history isn't an indication of anything in particular.

i know other people who have bizarre dreams, too but they don't have the deja vous...i just think i had really weird dreams cos i have an overactive imaginations! :biggrin:
The fact they stopped makes it more likely to me they were simple partials. I bet your immagination hasn't stopped being overactive.
as for the deja vous thing, i prefer to tell myself that i can see the future! hehe. thing is, i don't "remember" it until it's actually happening...too bad. =/ yes, i do get deja vous quite a lot
They can create the illusion you are living your life over and over again, and remember what is going to happen next. I used to call these "Phantom Memories of the Future."

We are always speculating about what is going to happen next. If you have a deja vu while you're doing this, that speculation seems so familiar that you're convinced it is a memory of the future from the last time you lived through the time loop. 95% of the time what you think is going to happen next doesn't. But if you happen to have another deja vu at the moment you realize what you thought was going to happen didn't, it fills you with the conviction "Oh yeah! This is what happens next, I remember it now!"

it's not that I am not just having the bizarre dreams anymore, I am not having ANY dreams any more. Help!
You should be having some dreams, at least. This is kinda strange not to have any.

Have you been able to sleep well every night?
 
  • #14
BicycleTree said:
What's the difference between a seizure and a normal period of increased brain activity, if any?
This would be a question for moonbear. I can explain seizure activity to a layman but I'm not sure what constitutes a "normal period of increased brain activity."

In seizure activity you have whole groups of neurons all firing at the same frequency in synch with each other. It's a matter of the damaged neurons setting the others around them off to no purpose.
 
  • #15
People have stopped dreaming after suffering brain damage, usually accompanied by vision problems. Suffer any brain damage recently?

Why not test yourself some weekend? Set your alarm a half hour early. If you can't recall any dreams, set it an hour early the next night. Actually, look at some sleep cycle info and see about how long your cycles should be around the time you wake up. Set your alarm accordingly (you'll want to wake up during REM).
 
  • #16
zoobyshoe said:
This would be a question for moonbear. I can explain seizure activity to a layman but I'm not sure what constitutes a "normal period of increased brain activity."

In seizure activity you have whole groups of neurons all firing at the same frequency in synch with each other. It's a matter of the damaged neurons setting the others around them off to no purpose.

Normal brain activity is orderly. With a seizure, the activity is disordered (the neurons don't fire in their proper order, although there is a focal point and activity can radiate out from that, it's not the order the neurons are supposed to fire).

The concept of synchrony of the bursts of activity of the individual neurons isn't necessarily true. This study (abstract quoted below) indicates the increased bursting is not synchronized firing. (Seizures are way outside of my field of expertise, so I'm being cautious in generalizing too much from this one study since I don't know if there is any contradictory evidence in the literature, and I'm not spending a lot of time looking for it.)

Van Drongelen W, Koch H, Marcuccilli C, Pena F, Ramirez JM. 2003 Synchrony levels during evoked seizure-like bursts in mouse neocortical slices. J Neurophysiol. 90:1571-80.

Slices (n = 45) from the somatosensory cortex of mouse (P8-13) generated spontaneous bursts of activity (0.10 +/- 0.05 Hz) that were recorded extracellularly. Multiunit action potential (AP) activity was integrated and used as an index of population activity. In this experimental model, seizure-like activity (SLA) was evoked with bicuculline (5-10 microM) or N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA, 5 microM). SLA was an episode with repetitive bursting at a frequency of 0.50 +/- 0.06 Hz. To evaluate whether SLA was associated with a change in synchrony, we obtained simultaneous intracellular and extracellular recordings (n = 40) and quantified the relationship between individual cells and the surrounding population of neurons. During the SLA there was an increase in population activity and bursting activity was observed in neurons and areas that were previously silent. We defined synchrony as cellular activity that is consistently locked with the population bursts. Signal-averaging techniques were used to determine this component. To quantitatively assess change in synchronous activity at SLA onset, we estimated the entropy of the single cell's spike trains and subdivided this measure into network burst-related information and noise-related entropy. The burst-related information was not significantly altered at the onset of NMDA-evoked SLA and slightly increased when evoked with bicuculline. The signal-to-noise ratio determined from the entropy estimates showed a significant decrease (instead of an expected increase) during SLA. We conclude that the increased population activity during the SLA is attributed to recruitment of neurons rather than to increased synchrony of each of the individual elements.
 
  • #17
honestrosewater said:
Maybe you just aren't waking up as often during the night. You can google to see if or why that may be the case.

Or you can just ask Moonbear. :biggrin: Speaking of sleep... :zzz:
You suggest asking me and then you fall asleep? :grumpy:

It could be part of it. I think I cited a study around these forums somewhere that indicated some people really just don't dream. They woke them up during the night, I believe during REM sleep, and there was still no recall of any dreams. But, most people just forget they had a dream when they wake up. So, it could be the case that if you wake up more frequently at night, you could remember more of those dreams, or if you are woken up before you're done dreaming in the morning, you'll remember them.

I almost never remember dreaming unless I dream during that time I'm dozing back off to sleep after hitting the snooze button. Though, when I do remember the dreams, they are definitely weird. So, I'm pretty sure I dream, but I very rarely remember the dreams. I think this is fairly common.
 
  • #18
Moonbear said:
Normal brain activity is orderly. With a seizure, the activity is disordered (the neurons don't fire in their proper order, although there is a focal point and activity can radiate out from that, it's not the order the neurons are supposed to fire).

The concept of synchrony of the bursts of activity of the individual neurons isn't necessarily true. This study (abstract quoted below) indicates the increased bursting is not synchronized firing. (Seizures are way outside of my field of expertise, so I'm being cautious in generalizing too much from this one study since I don't know if there is any contradictory evidence in the literature, and I'm not spending a lot of time looking for it.)

Van Drongelen W, Koch H, Marcuccilli C, Pena F, Ramirez JM. 2003 Synchrony levels during evoked seizure-like bursts in mouse neocortical slices. J Neurophysiol. 90:1571-80.
--obvious questions: How do they determine that asynchronicity is "noise" given that they don't understand how the mouse brain works? And how do you know that what researchers are calling seizure activity during deja vu exhibits the same characteristics as the SLA that the researchers saw in the mouse brains?
 
Last edited:
  • #19
gah, i haven't had any good dreams recently. i go to sleep thinking about math problems and work them over and over in my head all night, but of course i don't get anywhere, i don't really work them, my mind just stays focused on the numbers and i wake up really annoyed.
 
  • #20
Moonbear said:
It could be part of it. I think I cited a study around these forums somewhere that indicated some people really just don't dream. They woke them up during the night, I believe during REM sleep, and there was still no recall of any dreams. But, most people just forget they had a dream when they wake up. So, it could be the case that if you wake up more frequently at night, you could remember more of those dreams, or if you are woken up before you're done dreaming in the morning, you'll remember.
I'm a light sleeper and wake up frequently during the night and recall tons of dreams, so I would agree. My friend sleeps like a log and swears he rarely dreams.
 
  • #21
Moonbear said:
The concept of synchrony of the bursts of activity of the individual neurons isn't necessarily true. This study (abstract quoted below) indicates the increased bursting is not synchronized firing. (Seizures are way outside of my field of expertise, so I'm being cautious in generalizing too much from this one study since I don't know if there is any contradictory evidence in the literature, and I'm not spending a lot of time looking for it.)
All of the recent studies by reputable researchers I've read, or read quoted, are calling it "hypersynchronous firing". I was specifically taken to task on an epilepsy website for perveying the old "disorderly firing" explanation first proposed by J. Hughlings Jackson in the 1800s, a couple years ago.

The mouse brain study you quoted tells us how a slice of one part (somatosensory cortex) of one individual dead mouse's brain reacted to one specific chemical seizure inducing agent in a petri dish. This is no reason to even think about overturning the hypersynchronous firing findings.

It could simply be that mouse brain(specifically) + that specific chemical = disorderly firing.

Human neurologists aren't quick to adopt mouse research into human situations anyway. Although "kindling" has been proven over and over in mice, there are still human neurologists who speak of it as theoretical when it comes to people brains.
 
  • #22
BicycleTree said:
--obvious questions: How do they determine that asynchronicity is "noise" given that they don't understand how the mouse brain works? And how do you know that what researchers are calling seizure activity during deja vu exhibits the same characteristics as the SLA that the researchers saw in the mouse brains?

I can't get to the publisher's site now to read the full article (I should have access, but their site just isn't loading), so I'll give a tentative answer based on what I know of electrophysiology and what the abstract said and will have to reserve the right to correct that later once I can read the full article.

They aren't saying the noise is evidence of asynchronicity. They are using the information from single-cell recordings to determine what is likely signal (a small spike on the recording corresponding to a single cell firing), and what is noise (a spike smaller than the recording from a single cell firing). So, what they should then be doing is subtracting out the noise to make sure they aren't mistakenly calling the noise neuronal activity. When you do multiunit recording, if several cells fire all at once, you get a larger spike in the recording than if fewer or just one cell fires at a time. So, asynchronicity of firing should be detected by variable spike sizes. I don't know if there was a regular frequency though. There are two ways you could potentially interpret variable spike sizes, and you'd need to analyze the pattern. There could be several groups of cells each firing in synchrony, but not with other groups, which should give somewhat of a regular pattern to the trace as each group took its turn (I hope that's making some sense), or every cell could be doing its own thing, in which case you wouldn't expect to find any pattern at all.

As for whether the seizure-like activity is truly representative of a simple partial seizure, I don't know that. I was just trying to address the general question of what a seizure is and to present some evidence indicating that it's not necessarily synchronized activity (that's the question I thought zooby was addressing with that remark). Since there are different types of seizures, some may be characterized by more synchronized activity...that's why I pointed out this is far afield of my expertise.

Also, I don't know that this is the explanation for the deja vu experiences either. There could be a far more mundane explanation of that. It's really only speculating we're doing here.

I'm realizing I also may have misunderstood your original question. I'm now not sure if you were asking the difference between seizures and normal brain activity, or if you were asking if seizures are increased activity of neurons. They are increased activity, but different from normal in its pattern of progression (doesn't require a neuronal network of synaptic connections, but could be just a response to something in the extracellular fluid, such as the NMDA used in the article I cited).

I probably shouldn't make this response too long until I can get that full article to confirm what I'm saying.
 
  • #23
zoobyshoe said:
All of the recent studies by reputable researchers I've read, or read quoted, are calling it "hypersynchronous firing". I was specifically taken to task on an epilepsy website for perveying the old "disorderly firing" explanation first proposed by J. Hughlings Jackson in the 1800s, a couple years ago.

The mouse brain study you quoted tells us how a slice of one part (somatosensory cortex) of one individual dead mouse's brain reacted to one specific chemical seizure inducing agent in a petri dish. This is no reason to even think about overturning the hypersynchronous firing findings.

It could simply be that mouse brain(specifically) + that specific chemical = disorderly firing.
Hence my caveat. Though, it wasn't just one individual mouse. That's quite a gross oversimplification of what they were showing. You can't do the sort of recording they were doing in live animals or whole brain.

Human neurologists aren't quick to adopt mouse research into human situations anyway. Although "kindling" has been proven over and over in mice, there are still human neurologists who speak of it as theoretical when it comes to people brains.
Well, that's another issue altogether. I too am cautious about drawing too many conclusions from studies in mice (it's one of the reasons I don't use rodents in my own research, because despite the immense bias of NIH toward rodents and against other animal models when it comes to funding the studies, rodents are just a lousy model for what I study), but to just dismiss something because it was done in mice is no better.
 
  • #24
BicycleTree said:
And how do you know that what researchers are calling seizure activity during deja vu exhibits the same characteristics as the SLA that the researchers saw in the mouse brains?
I can't answer this question, however, I can tell you how they proved the deja vu was seizure activity.

The study was a spinoff of the fact that when preparing a person for brain surgery for severe epilepsy they sometimed would have them come into the hospital for weeks ahead of time to try and determine the exact location of the seizure focus which was to be removed.

They way they went about determning the focus was to actually drill several small holes in the scull and insert hair-thin electrodes into the brain. These were sensitive to electrical activity only at certain equally spaced points along the electrode. That was so they could determine depth.

It is already well known how to determine the general area that is seizing just from certain symptoms. Several electrodes in, say, the temporal lobe should, therefore, allow them to find a much more specific point in the temporal lobe where the trouble originates.

During these pre-operative studies several of the patients EEG recordings started to go show clear seizure activity in and around the hippocampus. When asked what they were experiencing, they reported Deja Vu symptoms: the strange feeling that they had lived through all this before and could sense what was going to happen next.

It is not at all uncommon for people with severe seizures to also experience simple partial seizures. These deja vus were not new to these patients, but they weren't the seizures they were being operated on for. The hippocampus is very deep in the brain, and deja vus don't show up on surface EEGs. Alot of simple partial seizures are too small to register on surface electrodes. These depth studies have confirmed a lot of simple partial symptoms are seizure activity, symptoms that were only previously suspected.


I wish I could show you what the EEG of a deja vu looks like, but don't have a scanner. The electrical activity jumps to, by my estimate, ten times the amplitude of the normal amplitude. It is no wonder to me these illusions are so convincing; they're supercharged.

Whenever I have a deja vu I am perfectly convinced, while it is happening, that I have lived the moment before. It is too real and powerful, while it's happening, to even question it. It's ony after it's over that I can say to myself it had to have been an illusion. Seeing that EEG of a deja vu explained to me why that is the case.
 
  • #25
Moonbear said:
Hence my caveat. Though, it wasn't just one individual mouse. That's quite a gross oversimplification of what they were showing.
All I read was the abstract you quoted. I saw "mouse brain" not "mice brains". Not an oversimplification on my part, rather a misreading of a generic term to be an individual term.
You can't do the sort of recording they were doing in live animals or whole brain.
True, which is another reason not to jump to too many conclusions. I have to wonder what difference, if any, these circumstances have on how the neurons behave. Does the fact they've been separated from all communication with their usual ciruits make any difference?
but to just dismiss something because it was done in mice is no better.
I don't think anyone dismisses it out of hand. It's just that you have to avoid the mistake of assuming that what happens in mice will happen in any other animal or in humans.

No one is allowed to experiment with kindling on people, so it's a theory that will never be tested, yet most epileptologists believe it to be fact based on the way some people's seizures get more frequent and more extensive if untreated.
 
  • #26
zoobyshoe said:
True, which is another reason not to jump to too many conclusions. I have to wonder what difference, if any, these circumstances have on how the neurons behave. Does the fact they've been separated from all communication with their usual ciruits make any difference?
There is always the concern of doing such recordings on slices, but the slices are usually thick enough that not all communication with the local circuits are cut off. Though, as I'm now looking through more of the literature, it looks to me like the term "hypersynchronous" is being used exclusively in terms of EEG recordings, which are not the same as electrophysiological multiunit activity recordings. So, asynchronicity in the MUA recordings may not mean anything different from EEG recordings, which wouldn't be as sensitive to changes in single neurons firing. We may just be discussing apples and oranges here.
 
  • #27
Moonbear said:
I'm realizing I also may have misunderstood your original question. I'm now not sure if you were asking the difference between seizures and normal brain activity, or if you were asking if seizures are increased activity of neurons.
I took him to be asking the difference between seizures and any non-pathological increase in brain activity people might experience.

You must have seen pet scans of people's brains when they're involved in some task that requires focus, or when they're somehow stimulated to greater brain activity: the brain is clearly more lit up in certain areas.

I think he is asking what is going on with the neurons when that kind of thing happens.
 
  • #28
Moonbear said:
So, asynchronicity in the MUA recordings may not mean anything different from EEG recordings, which wouldn't be as sensitive to changes in single neurons firing. We may just be discussing apples and oranges here.
This is possible. I'll try to dig up the pub-med general paper on seizures and see if they refer to individual neurons all firing in synchrony or not. (I have it printed out, and pidgeonholed somewhere in the brush shelter here.)
 
  • #29
totallyclueless said:
I used to have the strangest, most strange, complex dreams. I had them every night from as long as I can remember. It was fun telling my dreams to people the next day. I got strange looks and laughs because they were so strange and long. Sometimes, they even came true. O__o

Anyway, lately my dreams have just been...GONE. Not there at all. If I do have a dream, it's very brief and meaningless...like me looking in a mirror and seeing my hair has gotten very long even tho in real life it is short. It's sad, because I used to be known as the crazy girl who told long, outlandish dream stories at the lunch table at school, but now I have nothing to report! lol. I want to get my weird dreams back. It's been a while. Does anybbody know why they stopped? :cry:

Also, lately, I've been having some really strong de ja vous. Like I dreamed it would happen...only I didn't...i just feel like i did. the other day i had a real long one in English class...i could have sworn i dreamed that at the beginning of the year. I know this has nothing to do with the post, but does neone know why i always have de ja vous? :confused:
So you're one of those people who forces people to listen to your dream stories? :grumpy: Maybe someone put a curse on you because he/she's tired of listening to your stories? :wink:
my parents used to talk about their dreams during breakfast :cry: haha after I started leaving them when they were talking about their dreams :biggrin: they don't do it anymore! o:)
but anyway I myself can't remember my dreams when I'm too exhausted or stressed-out about sth.
and recently I had a dream about an important piece of news and I can't remember what the news was exactly! :grumpy:
 
  • #30
Moonbear said:
You suggest asking me and then you fall asleep? :grumpy:
Pure coincidence. Your posts are always fascinating. :zzz:
 
  • #31
Hey, who moved the smilies again? :wink: o:)
 
  • #32
once i had a dream that i was a very old man riding one of the rides outside of the supermarket. the little kids were staring at me.

fibonacci
 

1. What causes really bizarre dreams?

There are several factors that can contribute to having really bizarre dreams, including stress, medication, sleep disorders, and certain foods. Dreams are also thought to be a way for our brains to process and make sense of our daily experiences and emotions.

2. Can deja vu be explained by science?

While the exact mechanism of deja vu is still not fully understood, there are several scientific theories that attempt to explain it. Some suggest that it is a glitch in the brain's memory system, while others propose that it is a result of similarities between current and past experiences.

3. Is it normal to have deja vu frequently?

Deja vu is a common experience, with up to 70% of people reporting having experienced it at least once. However, frequent or persistent deja vu can be a symptom of certain neurological conditions, so it is important to consult a doctor if you are concerned.

4. Are there any benefits to having really bizarre dreams?

While bizarre dreams can be unsettling, they can also provide insight into our subconscious thoughts and emotions. They can also serve as a source of creativity and inspiration for artists and writers.

5. Can dreams and deja vu be controlled or manipulated?

There is no scientific evidence to suggest that dreams or deja vu can be controlled or manipulated. However, some techniques such as lucid dreaming may allow individuals to have some control over their dreams.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
926
  • General Discussion
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • Biology and Medical
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
39
Views
8K
Replies
121
Views
9K
Back
Top