• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Recoil energy and Heisenberg Uncertainty principal

  • Thread starter amb123
  • Start date
  • #1
98
0
I need to prove that the act of measuring exactly the position of an electron would change its orbit.

change in position x change in momentum = h

the limit would suggest that knowing the location exactly would set the change in momentum p= h

What is the formula that relates energy above a quantity with changing orbits? I saw that the Rhydberg formula gives an Ionization energy, I am thinking that if I can prove that the energy change due to measurement is at least equal to this quantity then I have proven a change in orbit. Is this correct? I have found this energy to be in the 10^-18 J range, any ideas on what I can look at to figure this out? I have spent so much time on this and still have nothing more than qualitative answer that is given by the heisenberg principal.

Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
-A
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
538
2
Orbits are wavefuction density of electrons in an atom . With each electron is associated a spatial distribution within an atom.So HUP assigns that , at a given instant you can only determine one of the aspects out of position and momentum precisely . For an accurate knowledge of position , you have to sacrifice your knowledge about the associated momentum. Because there are only some premissible values of energy are allowed for an electron , so whenever there is some disturbance in the environment of an electron , it is transmitted and absorbed by the electron , and if that disturbance is ramnant enough to provide the minimum possible energy for an electron to make a transition , it will . So the "act of measuring " the position/momentum will always lead to a disturbance.

BJ
 
  • #3
98
0
"it is transmitted and absorbed by the electron , and if that disturbance is ramnant enough to provide the minimum possible energy for an electron to make a transition , it will ."

Yes, I think i'm actually getting a little closer to solving this (after hours of trying..) I will update tomorrow. This is interesting stuff, I wish I was better with it (and it will be a detriment to me if I don't become better really quickly!)

thx.
-A
 

Related Threads on Recoil energy and Heisenberg Uncertainty principal

  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
925
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
837
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
106
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
57
Views
3K
Top