Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Recommended mathematics books

  1. Mar 10, 2004 #1
    I've been looking for good mathematical books to read, semi-popular level books which aren't afraid to use mathematical equations, and which might even double as a good book for a mathematics undergraduate to read as a kind of supplement to standard textbooks. Just some examples of what I have in mind:

    Infinity and the Mind by Rudy Rucker (but a little too mystical for my tastes)

    Proofs from the Book by Martin Aigner and Günter M. Ziegler (a bit too much for my mediocre mind, but some of it got through)

    Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid by Douglas R. Hofstadter (a classic, but not just about maths)

    Gamma: Exploring Euler's Constant by Julian Havil (really enjoyed this one)
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 11, 2004 #2
    fermat's last enigma is good. i forget the author...
     
  4. Mar 11, 2004 #3

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    A Very SHort Introduction to Mathematics, Tim Gowers

    The Joy of Counting, Tom Korner

    The Music of the Primes, Marcus De Sautoy

    Fourier Analysis on Finite Abelian Groups, Audrey Terras

    Arfken's Mathematical Physics book, can't recall the name.

    Representations of Groups, James and Lieback

    Chaos, by James Gleick if it's still around.

    They're a mixture of styles, levels and intents. Every mathematician ought to own at least one of them, except the Gleick one, which was fashionable about 8 years ago.
     
  5. Mar 11, 2004 #4
    Hi There,

    I don't know if you've ever heard of Vedic Maths. It's a fantastic book by this Indian author... can't get the name... but just look for vedic math book.... he's the guy who developed this concept and wrote the book... it teaches you to do a whole lot of problems mentally.... like 97 times 98.... or 1/29.... trust me its worth it... look for vedic maths on the internet to get a sample of what the book contains...
     
  6. Mar 13, 2004 #5
    Hello.

    I was wondering where I may be able to find an online copy of Godel, Escher and Bach as I just CANNOT find it in any bookshop I've been to. Sadly, my father doesn't let me buy books online so I can't get it from Amazon or Barnes & Noble.
     
  7. Mar 13, 2004 #6

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    the ability to do mental arithmetic is not a useful attribute for a mathematician, except when trying to figure out what her expenses claim is for dinner.

    I don't think this book is remotely applicable to the learning of higher mathematics, merely arithmetic. A lot of people don't realize they are different things. Of course I could be stigmatizing it unfairly, but seeing as you sell it on the principle of being able to mutliply two not particualry interesting numbers together, I'll presume that's all it does.

    It so happens that many mathematicians are good at sums, but I can think of a few who can't balance a check book, to borrow someone else's phrase.
     
  8. Mar 13, 2004 #7
    agreed, but can you say you really understand math if you don't understand numbers?
     
  9. Mar 13, 2004 #8
    Perfect!!! I totally agree this book doesn't teach you math at all... but it teaches u the art of manipulation... just how you can see calculations differently... i found that impressive... Also it doens't just serve multiplication, division, etc of particular nos., specially division applies to all nos... just that it'd be slightly harder than the easiest method specified...
    the reason y this book shud be of particular to indians is in india like most eastern countries, students are not allowed to use calculators at all...
    You'll have to agree with me when i say manipulating nos and expressions is an art that you need every time, every where in math...
    there is a big debate on the actual utility of this book and the derivation of these results from Vedas (which even i dont think is true... )
     
  10. Mar 13, 2004 #9
    indeed. so why not delve into the art of manipulation?
     
  11. Mar 13, 2004 #10
    i would... i learnt a lot from the book... i used it to learn manipulation... it dint speed up my calculations too much coz i still prefer using the calculator (thanx to the north american system)...
    I like manipulation now... i used to hate it in the 8th grade but then i developed it in 10th grade and i like it a lot now (even tho i'm not a master)....
     
  12. Mar 13, 2004 #11
    i think every mathematician learns how to manipulate in their own way. matt didn't learn it with numbers and he doesn't have to. most mathematicians push around abstract objects; that's what they're good at. playing chess won't teach you how to fight a real battle and learning numbers won't teach you how to push around abstract ideas. but the essence of manipulation is the same in all forms. debate. warfare. interpersonal manipulation. manipulation of inner chi. manipulation of "the system". the spirit of manipulation is the same in all forms. either way you pick up that spirit it makes no difference. once you learn it, you can manipulate anything that can be manipulated.
     
  13. Mar 13, 2004 #12
    so u say that the book is useless and doesn't teach any manipulation... and that manipulation can't be learnt thro such books? its gained tho the process of learning math as such?
     
  14. Mar 13, 2004 #13
    is that for me or matt?

    i didn't mean that at all. i meant that any way to learn manipulation is great, whether it be numbers or abstract ideas or martial arts.
     
  15. Mar 13, 2004 #14
    tat was for matt... i totally agree with pheonix when he/she says "i meant that any way to learn manipulation is great, whether it be numbers or abstract ideas or martial arts"
     
  16. Mar 14, 2004 #15
    I totally disagree with all the things that have been cropped up concerning vedic mathematics.

    It teaches u higher mathematics as well.

    All the Higher Science are encoded in the form of mantras. There is no meaning to reading vedic mathematics if u dont know how to decode the matras and how to get knowledge out of it.There are instances that Calculus was used in Vedic period which was way before Newton found it.

    The manipulation part Karan is dealing with is just the basic concept which have been i believe decoded by the Indian authors.
     
  17. Mar 14, 2004 #16
    recon, I will send you my copy of Godel, Escher, Bach. I'll need a mailing address, though. You can send me a private message with this info. If you're worried about sending a mail address online, you can use a post office address, or you can let your father know that I am willing to send you this book. I have no need for this book anymore, so giving it away is the logical thing to do.
     
  18. Mar 14, 2004 #17

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Why does the word vedic always start debate?

    The initial request was for books that help you understand the mathematics taught at university, that, if you will, complement and explain how to think about the issues raised in such a course.

    The reason offered to read the vedic book was because it would let you mutliply 97 an 98 in your head, and work out 1/29.

    That isn't mathematics, take it from a mathematician.

    The ability to do mental arithmetic is very useful, understanding how the tricks work is also useful, anything that gets students thinking must be good (I always recommend cryptic crosswords), but these aren't the things that the original request addressed.

    I too went too went to a university where calculators wre banned in mathematics, but there were never any questions that required a calculator, and nor should there be in a mathematics degree, because it's mathematics, not arithmetic. If I ask you to work out the remanider of division by 37 of 36! you shouldn't need a caculator. Not because you're vedically informed and can do it in your head, but because you've learned about Fermat's Little Theorem.

    "So u say that the book is useless and doesn't teach any manipulation... and that manipulation can't be learnt thro such books? its gained tho the process of learning math as such?"

    I said no such thing. If you read what I wrote you will see that in fact I said that it appears it does teach the manipulation of numbers, and if that's all it does it's useless for understanding the material in a course on category theory say.

    And if that is a standard of the ability to write in English that is learned through reading such books then I could make more comments.
     
  19. Mar 14, 2004 #18
    Y is this matt dude so infuriated by anythign vedic...??? have u had terrible experiences with indians b4 or something???
    ok... i agree this link was meant for books that help you understand math and not teach arithmetic... SO ? that doesn't really mean you can't have posts that guide people to such books as vedic math!!! All those people who've seen this book in my study have loved it and these are people from the math faculty of university of waterloo (canada)...
    what kind of close minded mathematician are btw??? the kind that thinks his own way of looking at things is the only way and little flexibility (ie. talking of arithmetic books in a thread meant for math concepts) is not even remotely acceptable????
    Dude... u gotta a learn to take things cool!!!
     
  20. Mar 14, 2004 #19

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Why do you think I dislike Vedic maths? Which part of what I've written implies I think it's a bad thing? In fact didn't I say that anything that gets students thinking is good and that I encourage my students to do cryptic crosswords?

    I do get massively p*****d off by being misrepresented by people, especially those who can't use exclamation marks or question marks, and think that u is an acceptable variant of you except when texting.

    I do not think it is very important as *mathematics* from what you say about it.


    Please, if you are going to reply, do not call me dude. A nod in the direction of grammar would be nice, but not important.

    Generally, it seems that its supporters think it has applications everywhere and they have often hijacked threads. That is why I state it always seems to trigger a debate.

    Now, you ought to read my posts and see if you can find in them any statements that actually support you opinion on my view of Vedic maths.

    That's twice now I've been completely misrepresented in this (off topic) thread. Care to make it three?
     
  21. Mar 14, 2004 #20
    matt, i aknowledge that they are possibly misrepresenting you. i respect you as a mathematican. now read my paper, please master sir! ;P
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Recommended mathematics books
  1. Book recommendation (Replies: 1)

  2. Mathematics Books (Replies: 2)

  3. Book Recommendations? (Replies: 1)

Loading...