Record & Turntable: Final Rotational Kinetic Energy

  • Thread starter gills
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Turntable
In summary: But here, the initial and final values of \omega are the same (zero), so the change in \omega is also zero. Therefore, to find the average torque, you don't have to divide by \Delta t, you just have to find the final torque, and it will be the same as the average torque. Right?Now, in the first part of the problem, you were given the final angular velocity, but in this second part, you don't know the final angular velocity. But you do know that the final angular velocity will be the same for both disks. So you can use the final angular velocity you found in part (a) to answer part (b). In summary, the scenario
  • #1
gills
116
0

Homework Statement



Consider a turntable to be a circular disk of moment of inertia I_t rotating at a constant angular velocity w_i around an axis through the center and perpendicular to the plane of the disk (the disk's "primary axis of symmetry"). The axis of the disk is vertical and the disk is supported by frictionless bearings. The motor of the turntable is off, so there is no external torque being applied to the axis.
Another disk (a record) is dropped onto the first such that it lands coaxially (the axes coincide). The moment of inertia of the record is I_r. The initial angular velocity of the second disk is zero.

There is friction between the two disks.

After this "rotational collision," the disks will eventually rotate with the same angular velocity.

MAD_cl_3_r1.jpg


(a)Because of friction, rotational kinetic energy is not conserved while the disks' surfaces slip over each other. What is the final rotational kinetic energy, K_f, of the two spinning disks?
Express the final kinetic energy in terms of I_t, I_r , and K_i the initial kinetic energy of the two-disk system. No angular velocities should appear in your answer.

(b)Assume that the turntable deccelerated during time [tex]\Delta[/tex]t before reaching the final angular velocity ([tex]\Delta[/tex]t is the time interval between the moment when the top disk is dropped and the time that the disks begin to spin at the same angular velocity). What was the average torque,[tex]\tau[/tex] , acting on the bottom disk due to friction with the record?
Express the torque in terms of I_t, w_i, w_f, and [tex]\Delta[/tex]t

Homework Equations



K_i - K_f = [tex]\Delta[/tex]K lost to friction --->

(1/2)I_1*w_1i^2 + (1/2)I_2 * w_2i^2 = (1/2)I_1 * w_1f^2 + (1/2)I_2 * w_2f^2



The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, I've only attempted part (a) at the moment so i need to concentrate on that first. then i'll move onto part (b)

What is confusing is what the question is asking for. delta K is just the initial - final energies, but where does that stand in the solution they are looking for.

This is what i know --->
K_i = (1/2)I_t * w_i^2

K_f = (1/2)w_f^2(I_t + I_r)

How and where do I get rid of the w's and where is delta K in the solution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You don't need delta K, you just need to express K_f in terms of K_i and the other variables. First find w_f. You'd do that just like you did in that similar problem the other day. Once you find w_f, then worry about finding K_f and expressing it the way they want it. (It will take a little algebraic rearranging, that's all.)
 
  • #3
Rotational kinetic energy is not conserved?
But there is a rotational quantity that is conserved. What is it?
 
  • #4
Doc Al said:
You don't need delta K, you just need to express K_f in terms of K_i and the other variables. First find w_f. You'd do that just like you did in that similar problem the other day. Once you find w_f, then worry about finding K_f and expressing it the way they want it. (It will take a little algebraic rearranging, that's all.)

I've already figured w_f from the first part of this problem that i didn't post--->

w_f = (I_t * w_i)/(I_t + I_r) ---> i plug this into K_f --->

K_f = (1/2)w_f^2(I_t + I_r) ---> so --->

(1/2)[(I_t * w_i)/(I_t + I_r)]^2 * (I_t + I_r) ---> reduces to --->

(1/2) * (I_t * w_i)^2 / (I_t + I_r) ---> a little stuck here. I'm trying to figure out how i can get a K_i out of this expression...
 
  • #5
gills said:

Express the final kinetic energy in terms of I_t, I_r , and K_i the initial kinetic energy of the two-disk system. No angular velocities should appear in your answer.

This is what i know --->
K_i = (1/2)I_t * w_i^2

K_f = (1/2)w_f^2(I_t + I_r)

How and where do I get rid of the w's and where is delta K in the solution?


First thing, why do you need delta K? Neither it has been asked, nor it appears in the two equations you have quoted!
You need Kf in terms of It, Ir and Ki. In the above two equations, you have two unknowns, wf and wi. To get a required condition, you need just one more equation. So, somehow try to relate wf and wi.
Hint: You know some conservation laws, right?
 
  • #6
Substitute unwanted wi in terms of Ki.
 
  • #7
(K_i * I_t) / (I_t + I_r) ---> i believe this is correct...Now onto the second part...
 
  • #8
ya.. show ur attempt on the second part.
i would just like to point out one thing: note the striking similarity between

a particle, mass m1, with speed vi collides and sticks to a second particle, mass m1, at rest.
conservation of momentum: (m1+ m2).vf = m1.vi

a disk, mass moment of inertia I1, with rotational kinetic energy Ki collides and sticks to a second disk, mass moment of inertia I2, at rest.
and in this problem: (I1+ I2).Kf = I1.Ki

Have fun.
 
  • #9
part (b) solved:

w_f = w_i - [tex]\alpha[/tex]*[tex]\Delta[/tex]t --->

-[tex]\alpha[/tex] = (w_f - w_i) / [tex]\Delta[/tex]t --->

[tex]\tau[/tex] = I*[tex]\alpha[/tex] --->

[tex]\tau[/tex] = I[tex]^{t}[/tex] * (w_f - w_i) / [tex]\Delta[/tex]t
 
  • #10
gills said:
part (b) solved:

w_f = w_i - [tex]\alpha[/tex]*[tex]\Delta[/tex]t --->

-[tex]\alpha[/tex] = (w_f - w_i) / [tex]\Delta[/tex]t --->

[tex]\tau[/tex] = I*[tex]\alpha[/tex] --->

[tex]\tau[/tex] = I[tex]^{t}[/tex] * (w_f - w_i) / [tex]\Delta[/tex]t
Good! Realize that this is just the angular form of impulse. Just like linear impulse equals change in linear momentum, angular impulse equals change in angular momentum:
[tex]\tau \Delta t = \Delta L = I \Delta \omega[/tex]
 

1. What is rotational kinetic energy?

Rotational kinetic energy is a type of energy that an object possesses due to its rotation around an axis. It is determined by the object's moment of inertia and angular velocity.

2. How is rotational kinetic energy calculated?

Rotational kinetic energy is calculated using the formula E = 1/2 * I * ω^2, where E is the rotational kinetic energy, I is the moment of inertia, and ω is the angular velocity.

3. What is the relationship between rotational kinetic energy and record turntables?

Record turntables use rotational kinetic energy to play music. The motor in the turntable provides the torque, while the record's grooves provide the resistance necessary for the rotation. As the turntable spins, the stylus reads the grooves and converts the motion into sound.

4. How does the final rotational kinetic energy of a record turntable affect the sound quality?

The final rotational kinetic energy of a record turntable can affect the sound quality in several ways. If the turntable is rotating too slowly, the sound may be distorted or muffled. Conversely, if the turntable is rotating too quickly, the stylus may skip over grooves, resulting in a distorted sound. It is important to have the turntable rotating at a consistent and appropriate speed for optimal sound quality.

5. How can the final rotational kinetic energy of a record turntable be adjusted?

The final rotational kinetic energy of a record turntable can be adjusted by using a speed control knob or by using a strobe disc to calibrate the speed. Some turntables also have a pitch control feature that allows for fine-tuning of the rotational speed. It is important to regularly check and adjust the rotational kinetic energy of a turntable for optimal sound quality.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
669
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
992
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
33
Views
954
Replies
7
Views
278
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
774
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top