Recyclable or More Cost-Effective Dual-Injector Chamber

  • Thread starter RJARVIS
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Chamber
In summary, there are several alternatives to the expensive McMaster-Carr Dual-Chamber Epoxy-style injector, including using a single chamber with a plunger or screw mechanism, using filled polymers, or considering silicone-based polymers. These options can help reduce costs and allow for multiple injections without the issue of solidification.
  • #1
RJARVIS
1
0
I am finding a big bottleneck in my experiments to be the cost of empty McMaster-Carr Dual-Chamber Epoxy-style injector at $5-15 per chamber.

This injection molding is currently limited to one chamber per use. The issue is that once my injected polymer is squeezed out of the dual chamber, the viscous polymer solidifies and a new chamber must be used.

I was wondering if anyone has found a cheaper version of the dual-chambered epoxy from another manufacturer or a material other than the polyethylene dual-chambers that I could use for multiple injections.

ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1455054146.408296.jpg
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
There are several alternatives to the dual-chamber epoxy injection molding. One option is using a single chamber with a plunger or screw mechanism to inject the polymer into the molding chamber. This eliminates the need for multiple chambers and can be done at a much lower cost. Additionally, you could use filled polymers such as ABS/PLA, and nylon, which are much cheaper than polyethylene and can be used for multiple injections without solidifying. Finally, silicone-based polymers may also be considered as a more economical alternative to epoxy.
 

1. What is a recyclable or more cost-effective dual-injector chamber?

A recyclable or more cost-effective dual-injector chamber is a component used in scientific experiments that can be reused multiple times or is more affordable compared to other options. It typically has two injectors that can be used to introduce different substances into a reaction or mixture simultaneously.

2. What makes a dual-injector chamber more cost-effective?

A dual-injector chamber can be considered more cost-effective if it is made from materials that are cheaper to produce or if it can be reused multiple times without compromising its function. This can help save money in the long run compared to using single-use chambers.

3. How is a dual-injector chamber recycled?

The process of recycling a dual-injector chamber may vary depending on the material it is made from. In most cases, the chamber is thoroughly cleaned and any remaining substances are removed. It can then be repurposed for future experiments or melted down and molded into a new chamber.

4. What are the benefits of using a recyclable or more cost-effective dual-injector chamber?

Using a recyclable or more cost-effective dual-injector chamber can have several benefits. It can help reduce waste and minimize the environmental impact of scientific experiments. It can also be a more affordable option for researchers and scientists, allowing for more experimentation and progress in their work.

5. Are there any limitations to using a dual-injector chamber?

Like any scientific equipment, a dual-injector chamber may have its limitations. It is important to carefully consider the materials and design of the chamber to ensure it is suitable for the specific experiment or reaction. Additionally, some chambers may have a limited lifespan and may need to be replaced after a certain number of uses.

Similar threads

RadioInstigator: Building a SIGINT
    • DIY Projects
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top