Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A Reference for hypersurfaces

  1. Jun 11, 2016 #1
    Hi, I am studying Hypersurfaces and the intrinsic/extrinsic geometry from http://www.blau.itp.unibe.ch/newlecturesGR.pdf with the aim of understanding the Hamiltonian formalism of GR. Although interesting, the notions introduced in these notes lack mathematical rigor.

    I am looking for a text which introduces these topics with the full topological structure (written by a mathematician would be better). Thanks.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 13, 2016 #2

    andrewkirk

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    When frustrated by the lack of mathematical rigour in GR texts I turned to John Lee's 'Riemannian Manifolds', which is a mathematical text that is, as expected, rigorous and (in my opinion) reasonably easy to follow. I think it was somebody here on physicsforums that recommended it to me.

    There is a prequel by Lee: 'Smooth Manifolds', which may also be useful, depending on what notions you need to use. I have not felt the need to buy it yet but the result is that I am a little undercooked on vector field flows and Lie derivatives.

    The downside of Lee's book is that it doesn't specifically address Pseudo-Riemannian manifolds, which is what are used in GR. In many cases the distinction doesn't matter. But sometimes it does and then you have to adapt Lee's proofs to the Pseudo-Riemannian case yourself. Unfortunately I don't know of any mathematical texts (ie not by physicists) that address Pseudo-Riemannian manifolds. Perhaps others can suggest some.
     
  4. Jun 13, 2016 #3

    martinbn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I haven't looked in the notes, what exactly do you fine non-rigorous? Have you looked at O'Neil's book on semi-Riemannian geometry?
     
  5. Jun 13, 2016 #4
    Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2017
  6. Jun 13, 2016 #5
    Thanks andrewkirk, I will look into John Lee's 'Riemannian Manifolds'

    For instance the author defines an embedding as a map
    [tex]
    \Phi: \Sigma =\Sigma_n \hookrightarrow M_{n+1}
    [/tex]
    Now this definition raises questions such as
    • What is the nature of this map (homeomorphism or diffeomorphism)? Wikipedia gives more rigorous definition of [itex]\Phi[/itex] as a homeomorphism onto its image.
    • The author says that this embedding is represented by the parametric equations [itex]\Phi:x^{\alpha}(y^a)[/itex] How are these equations actually composed? I can only think as [itex]y^{\alpha}(\Phi^{-1}(\text{something with }x^a))[/itex] where [itex]y^{\alpha}, x^a[/itex] are charts of [itex]M,\Sigma[/itex] respectively.
    I think the author does not care about the structures like topology and even manifold in the notes.

    The references mentioned in Wikipedia are https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embedding#References, but I was not sure which one to follow.

    I will also look in O'Neill's book on semi-Riemannian geometry. Thanks again.
     
  7. Jun 13, 2016 #6

    martinbn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    For the first one, he actually explains what he means by an embedding, at the end of page 308 and the next page. About the notations it should be clear from the examples that he gives.
     
  8. Jun 13, 2016 #7
    I understand what he is explaining and I think it should be enough to serve the purpose (which is understanding the canonical GR). But again it would be nice to have a complete formal definition at one's disposal (like the way Carroll does in his notes).

    About the map [itex]\Phi[/itex], the author says
    So I was wondering what is the stronger topological condition.
     
  9. Jun 13, 2016 #8

    martinbn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    O'Neil might be to your taste, but at times it is about geometry that need not be relevant to relativity. You could perhaps read it selectively.
     
  10. Jun 13, 2016 #9
    The stronger topological condition is that the immersion ## f: M \rightarrow N## is an embedding if ##f ## is a homeomorphism of ##M## with ##f(M)## with the subspace topology. This is the case whenever ##M## is compact for example.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2016
  11. Jun 13, 2016 #10

    George Jones

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2017
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Reference for hypersurfaces
  1. Null Hypersurface (Replies: 9)

  2. Hypersurface meaning (Replies: 5)

Loading...