1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Reference frame question

  1. Apr 15, 2008 #1

    I'm quite new to relativity and I'm just going through some problems from past exam papers to prepare for an upcoming subject. The following question has me a little stumped:

    Betty is at the origin of her frame of reference. At a certain point in time, this also corresponds to the origin of Ann's reference frame. Betty gives Ann the following instructions: walk 1km East, 2km North and 3km East. (there is an x-y graph pictured, indicating that 1km East corresponds to local co-ordinates (1,0) and 1km North corresponds to local co-ordinates (0,1)). The questions are - What is Ann's final position in her own frame? What is Ann's final position in Betty's frame?

    Presumably, Ann and Betty are in different reference frames S and S' respectively, with S' moving at constant speed v relative to S.

    I hope somebody can help me.

    Kind Regards,
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 15, 2008 #2
    I suspect that Ann's position within her own frame is trivial (since she is the origin of her own frame), but you should note that directions of "East" and "North" generally refer to angular directions on a (presumably) spherical surface.


  4. Apr 15, 2008 #3


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Why 'presumably' ? If you don't have details of their relative velocities, how can the problem be solved ?
  5. Apr 15, 2008 #4

    What if Betty told Ann how fast to walk?:smile:

    I think the relations regarding N/E and x,y imply that Betty and Ann have the same velocity with respect to someting infinitely far away.

    Then again, if Betty told Ann to change her altitude, there would be a problem...


  6. Apr 15, 2008 #5
    This is why the question has stumped me. The way the question is worded, Betty and Ann are in different reference frames which must be moving at some velocity relative to each other, and perhaps they expect the answer to be in the form of variables - e.g. x' = 2+vt. Or have I misunderstood the question (I suspect that I have misunderstood it).
  7. Apr 17, 2008 #6
    Hi again,

    Using the Galilean transformations, I would say that in Betty's frame, Ann is at position (-2+vt, 2). But it worries me that no velocity has been given. The response from Antenna Guy makes sense so in that case both parties would agree that Ann is at (-2,2). What do you think?
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Reference frame question