# Reflecting e^x on graph

1. Jan 24, 2014

### brycenrg

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Consider the graph y = e^x

2. Relevant equations
Make an equation that results in reflecting about the line y = 2

3. The attempt at a solution
I came up with 2 - e^x

And when I put it in my calculator it makes sense.
Just -e^x is reflected among y = 0
so if you bring it up 2, to y = 2 then it will be reflected among y = 2.
My webassign says im incorrect and its actually 4 - e^x, why is this? I dont understand the logic

2. Jan 25, 2014

### Simon Bridge

No logic has been presented so that is not too surprising.

Did you try plotting the graphs and the mirror-line to see?

Probably you got it different from them because you missed something out - but I cannot tell.
The bits where you say "reflected among" makes no sense to me.
Please show your working, and reasoning.

I suspect you forgot the second shift of two units after you did the reflection.

3. Jan 25, 2014

### brycenrg

I'm apologize for the inefficient communication.

3. My Attempt

I start with e^x which is a curve that follows y=0 then starts to rise more abruptly at x=0

If - f(x) Makes you reflect over the x axis

Then - e^x will do a neccesary reflection for reflecting it about y = 2

Then I add +2 to the end of f(x) = -(e^x)+2 = 2-e^x

Although on my homework they say the correct answer is 4 - e^x

Saying I needed to time 2 for some reason, which is where I lose understanding.

4. Jan 25, 2014

### Mentallic

Let $f(x)=e^x$ and g(x) denote the function we're looking for. When we reflect about the line y=2, what we're saying is that we want $$2-f(x)=g(x)-2$$ to be true for all values of x that are in the domain of f(x). So when f(x) = 2, g(x) = 2. Your equation $g(x)=2-e^x$ is actually a reflection of f(x) in the line y=1.

5. Jan 25, 2014

### brycenrg

Thanks for the reply, but I still don't understand.

Doesn't - f(x) reflect over the x-axis.

So lets say I had f(x) = x^2 (using x^2, because its easier to see on my calculator where it reflects)

If I put -f(x) = -x^2 that would just reflect it over y=0 so the origin.

And adding two to -x^2 + 2 would just raise it up to the reflect line which is asked for.

Isn't that the same for a equation like e^x or any other form of f(x)

6. Jan 25, 2014

### Mentallic

Say you have the function f(x)=0 (the x-axis) and you want to reflect this function in the line y=2. Would your answer be g(x)=2? No, because g(x)=2 is on the line of reflection. You want g(x) to be the same distance above y=2 as f(x) is below y=2. So you're looking for g(x)=4.

Look back the distance equation I gave you:

$$2-f(x)=g(x)-2$$

Does this make intuitive sense to you?

If we rearrange the equation to solve for g(x), we get

$$g(x)=4-f(x)$$

That looks familiar, right?

Yes, $-e^x$ is a reflection in the x-axis, and yes, $2+(-e^x)=2-e^x$ will shift the function up 2 units, but this doesn't mean it's a reflection in the line y=2. Draw it out and understand that you want a function that reproduces f(x) below y=2 to another function g(x) above y=2. And vice versa, if f(x) is above y=2, then g(x) is below.

7. Jan 25, 2014

### brycenrg

WOOO lol wow.

Yes Thank you Mentallic! Your explanation gave me the little mental push. Much appreciated :)

8. Jan 25, 2014

### Mentallic

You're welcome And you can always extend this problem to shifting along any line y=a.

$$a-f(x)=g(x)-a$$

$$g(x)=2a-f(x)$$

9. Jan 25, 2014

### Simon Bridge

Hmmm - you missed off a step all right.
You forgot to translate back.

Probably best if I just show you with your own example.
Say you - to reflect $f(x)=x^2$ about $y=1$, would give you $g(x)=1-x^2$

Here it is:

... the blue curve is y=x2
... the red line is y=1: the mirror line
... the green line is y=1-x2

Notice how the green line is NOT the blue line reflected about the red one?
Easy test: put a small mirror on the red line and check.

Can you see what the correct reflected function is now?

#### Attached Files:

• ###### plot1.png
File size:
2.2 KB
Views:
667
10. Jan 25, 2014

### brycenrg

Thank you Simon Bridge, that helps alot. I appreciate your help. :)

11. Jan 25, 2014

### Simon Bridge

No worries.

It's usually easier to work these things out with pictures than algebra ... in future, try sketching the graphs out to check your work instead of just using single values on your calculator.

12. Jan 25, 2014

### Mentallic

I agree. If only creating pictures were as easy as writing down the algebra...

13. Jan 25, 2014

### Simon Bridge

... as we have just seen, making the pics is actually easier than writing down the correct algebra from off the top of one's head. OTOH: it is more labor-intensive to present a pic in this medium. Wolfram has an online mini-mathematica doesn't it? But what we really need is to get the output into a pic for presentation here.

What's cool about this place is that if I provide one approach, someone else tends to provide the other one.
So cheers :)

... note for those googling here in future:
It is usually easier to see what's going wrong if you can plot the graph.
Not everyone has GNU-Octave, Matlab or Mathematica - or the need for that kind of power all the time.

Wolfram has a widget for simple plots:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/widget/...le=Math Help Boards: Graph Plotter&theme=blue

It will let you plot more than one graph on the same axis too:
i.e.
expression: x^2, 1, 1-x^2
from: -2
to: 2

... will give you the same graph I presented above.

If you enter: e^x, 2, 2-e^x, 4-e^(x) for the expression, then you get to compare the different examples in post #1.

A simple algebraic test that would catch the above mistakes: consider - if the graph crosses the mirror line, then the reflection will also cross the mirror line in the same places.

Last edited: Jan 25, 2014
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted