Hello!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I thought I had a good picture of this stuff but now I suspect that I've mixed up things completely..

For su(2) we have:

[tex]f_{ab}\,^c = \epsilon_{ab}\,^c.[/tex]

Which means that, for the basis of our tangentspace we get:

[tex][\partial_a, \partial_b] = i \epsilon_{ab}\,^c\, \partial_c[/tex]

Where we can see that the space of linear approximations is closed under the Lie bracket product.

But what about the definition of a smooth manifold being locally euclidean?

For R^n we know that our orthogonal partial derivatives commute,

[tex]\partial_x\partial_y - \partial_y\partial_x = 0.[/tex]

Shouldnt we then expect the orthogonal derivatives to commute in su(2) as well?

This would mean that our structure constants are 0 both when a=b and when a is not equalt to b (for a orthonomal basis).

In other words.. it looks like the Lie algebra should be quite trivial.

This is of course not the case, but where does my mind make the mistake in this resoning?

Thanks!!

// Kontilera

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Regarding Lie algebras

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Regarding algebras | Date |
---|---|

B A Rational Game | Mar 24, 2018 |

I Issue regarding a subgroup | Feb 21, 2018 |

A proof regarding Rational numbers | Jun 25, 2013 |

Confusion regarding Residue Theorem | Dec 20, 2012 |

Regarding Einstein Summation Convention | Sep 30, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**