Hi everyone,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I don't fully understand what is the regular method to state and solve problems in GR when no handy hints like spherical symmetry or homogeneity of time are assumed. If I find myself in arbitrary reference frame with coordinates [itex]x^0[/itex], [itex]x^1[/itex], [itex]x^2[/itex], [itex]x^3[/itex] the meaning of which is unknown beforehand (or known only locally), how do I proceed with boundary conditions and stress-energy tensor?

Consider the following simple problem: two point masses [itex]m_1[/itex], [itex]m_2[/itex] are separated by distance [itex]a[/itex]. Obviously [itex]T_{\mu\nu}[/itex] is a sum of two delta functions. Suppose the first mass is at the origin but where then is the second mass? Should I write [itex]\delta(x^1 - a)[/itex] or [itex]\delta(\sqrt{(x^1)^2 + x^1 x^2} - a)[/itex] or ...? You may say - OK, choose the coordinates in such a way that [itex]\delta(x^1 - a)[/itex] would be valid. But there are only 4 possible coordinate transformations, what if I had thousands of point masses?

So it seems that in general a statement of a problem in GR is interconnected with its very solution, which is confusing: are all problems solvable? uniquely? what would a "real mccoy" equation look like?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Regular method to solve GR equations

Loading...

Similar Threads - Regular method solve | Date |
---|---|

A Euclidean Methods for BTZ black Hole | Aug 18, 2017 |

I Non-diagonal metric for testing elliptic PDE solver | Jun 22, 2017 |

I Different methods of deriving the energy-momentum equation | Feb 5, 2017 |

Deriving geodesic equation using variational principle | Feb 10, 2016 |

Regular empirical evidence of curved space or massless photons? | Mar 19, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**