Relative Density of metal powder

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on determining the relative density of metal powders, specifically focusing on the methodology for measuring relative density in powdered form, with an emphasis on stainless steel 316L powder. The scope includes experimental approaches and considerations related to particle shape and handling of the powder.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about methods to determine the relative density of metal powders.
  • Another participant suggests that the relative density can be calculated by multiplying the bulk density by the density of the metal in solid form.
  • A participant specifies their experiment involving 57 micron spherical stainless steel 316L powder, providing bulk and solid densities to calculate a relative density of 0.375.
  • One participant confirms the calculation appears correct and discusses how particle shape and arrangement affect density measurements.
  • It is noted that different handling methods can lead to varying density measurements, with specific examples provided regarding the arrangement of particles.
  • A further point is raised about the density of mixtures of different sized spheres potentially being greater than that of uniform-sized spheres, suggesting the need for consistent sampling across batches.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the factors influencing relative density measurements, particularly regarding particle shape and handling. There is no consensus on a single method or outcome, as different approaches and considerations are discussed.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on particle shape, handling methods, and the need for consistent sampling across batches, which may affect the accuracy of density measurements.

irfanirsyad
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
How can I determine relative density of solids in powdered form? or in other word... How do you determine relative density of metal powder... Thank you..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That depends on the powder,the shape of the individual particles and what you do with the powder. If you know the bulk density, multiply it with the density of your metal (as solid object).
 
Thank you very much for the prompt reply mfb. To be more precise, in my experiment... I would like to determine the relative density of 57 micron (spherical shape) Stainless Steel 316L powder... After poured inside a container, the bulk density is around 3000 kg/m^3. Since the density of 316L powder is 8000 kg/m^3, so the relative density should be 3000/8000 which is 0.375… Is it correct? Regarding your comment, how the shape of individual particle and what I do with the powder will affect the result? Thank you again….
 
That looks correct.

Imagine a powder consisting of small cubes of equal size: With good tools, you can arrange them one by one to fill the whole space with the cubes. But if you just fill some container, they will arrange somewhat randomly and have a lot of free space between them. If you then shake this container carefully, they tend to fill some of these spaces and get a higher density.
Now you have three different densities, depending on your handling of the powder.

With spheres, the highest possible density is ~75%.
With irregular shapes, it is often lower, as they can block each other in many ways.
 
And a mixture of big and small spheres can be more dense than just big spheres. For a reliable answer I reckon you have to measure samples and keep checking that the mix is consistent between batches.
 
Thank you very much mfb and sophiecentaur for the answers... I really appreciate them..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K