Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Relative mass and velocity

  1. Nov 14, 2011 #1
    Hi.. What will be the nature of relativistic mass when a body moves with speed of light..?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 14, 2011 #2

    ghwellsjr

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    You're in luck. There's a website devoted to your question:

    http://www.relativisticmass.com [Broken]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
  4. Nov 14, 2011 #3

    Matterwave

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    A massive body cannot move at the speed of light, and a mass-less body does not allow a good definition of relativistic mass.
     
  5. Nov 14, 2011 #4

    pervect

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Relativisitc mass is just another name for energy, so a light wave has some. However its wrong to ascribe gravity as being a force due to relativistic mass (though if you're lucky you'll be within a factor of 2 of the correct answer. For instance, you'll get only half the expected deflection of light by using a quasi-Newtonian approach.)

    "Relativistic mass" is an SR concept that is not particularly useful in GR, and pretty much of a dead end. The good news is it can be defined, the bad news is it's not particularly good for anything, including computing gravity, and the things that it can do can be done just as well if not better by other means.

    So if you're asking about the relativistic mass of light in order to compute the gravitational effect of light, you're asking the wrong question.

    Many modern SR treatments of SR don't even bother with relativistic mass anymore, though you'll find the occasionall odd enthusiast of the topic, and an occasional textbook reference (mostly in older textbooks).

    "Relativistic mass" seems very appealing to the mass media and lay audience more than it's use in the professional literature for some reason.

    Good relativistic treatments of mass by General Relativity are a fairly advanced subject in general relativity. In the current state of the art, there is not one, but several competing definitions of mass, each of which can be applied to their own class of problem.

    The Komar mass, which applies to static space times, is one of the simplest. A few other examples are ADM and Bondi masses, and there are others, though these are probalby the 3 most common.
     
  6. Nov 16, 2011 #5
    Thaaanks...
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Relative mass and velocity
  1. Velocity and mass? (Replies: 8)

  2. Mass and velocity (Replies: 4)

  3. Velocity and Mass (Replies: 5)

Loading...